Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/226467
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
SHARE CORE BASE | |
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE | |
Título: | Comparison of next-generation sequencing (NGS) and next-generation flow (NGF) for minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment in multiple myeloma |
Autor: | Medina, Alejandro; Puig, Noemi; Flores-Montero, Juan; Jiménez, Cristina; Sarasquete, María Eugenia; García-Alvarez, María; Prieto-Conde, Isabel; Chillón, M. del Carmen; Alcoceba, Miguel; Gutiérrez, Norma Carmen; Oriol, Albert; Rosiñol, Laura; Bladé, Joan; Gironella, Mercedes; Hernandez, Miguel T.; González-Calle, Verónica; Cedena, Maria-Teresa; Paiva, Bruno; San-Miguel, Jesús; Lahuerta, Juan José; Mateos, Maria Victoria; Martínez-López, Joaquín; Orfao, Alberto CSIC ORCID ; González, Marcos CSIC ORCID ; García-Sanz, Ramón | Palabras clave: | Myeloma Risk factors |
Fecha de publicación: | 2020 | Editor: | Springer Nature | Citación: | Blood Cancer Journal 10: 108 (2020) | Resumen: | Detecting persistent minimal residual disease (MRD) allows the identification of patients with an increased risk of relapse and death. In this study, we have evaluated MRD 3 months after transplantation in 106 myeloma patients using a commercial next-generation sequencing (NGS) strategy (LymphoTrack®), and compared the results with nextgeneration flow (NGF, EuroFlow). The use of different marrow pulls and the need of concentrating samples for NGS biased the applicability for MRD evaluation and favored NGF. Despite that, correlation between NGS and NGF was high (R2 = 0.905). The 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates by NGS and NGF were longer for undetectable vs. positive patients (NGS: 88.7% vs. 56.6%; NGF: 91.4% vs. 50%; p < 0.001 for both comparisons), which resulted in a 3-year overall survival (OS) advantage (NGS: 96.2% vs. 77.3%; NGF: 96.6% vs. 74.9%, p < 0.01 for both comparisons). In the Cox regression model, NGS and NGF negativity had similar results but favoring the latter in PFS (HR: 0.20, 95% CI: 0.09–0.45, p < 0.001) and OS (HR: 0.21, 95% CI: 0.06–0.75, p = 0.02). All these results reinforce the role of MRD detection by different strategies in patient prognosis and highlight the use of MRD as an endpoint for multiple myeloma treatment. | Descripción: | © The Author(s) 2020. | Versión del editor: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41408-020-00377-0 | URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10261/226467 | DOI: | 10.1038/s41408-020-00377-0 | E-ISSN: | 2044-5385 |
Aparece en las colecciones: | (IBMCC) Artículos |
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero | Descripción | Tamaño | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Comparison_Medina_Art2020.pdf | 890,68 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizar/Abrir |
CORE Recommender
PubMed Central
Citations
33
checked on 05-abr-2024
SCOPUSTM
Citations
64
checked on 11-abr-2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
55
checked on 25-feb-2024
Page view(s)
162
checked on 18-abr-2024
Download(s)
150
checked on 18-abr-2024