Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/223268
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
SHARE BASE | |
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE | |
Título: | Comparing contingent valuation and choice modeling using field and eye-tracking lab data |
Autor: | Oviedo Pro, José Luis CSIC ORCID; Caparrós Gass, Alejandro CSIC ORCID | Palabras clave: | Stated preferences Environmental valuation Elicitation formats Eye-tracking |
Fecha de publicación: | nov-2014 | Editor: | Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (España) | Citación: | Instituto de Políticas y Bienes Públicos (IPP) CSIC, Working Paper 2014-01 | Resumen: | We compare contingent valuation and choice modeling with field and eye-tracker data. Contrary to previous research, results yield significantly different structural models. These divergences remain for modified formats that minimize visual and cognitive differences between formats. We also find divergent results concerning information processing. In choice modeling, respondents devote more time to attributes, including the bid, although total answering time does not vary. Presenting several questions with varying attribute levels works for choice modeling but not for contingent valuation. Using the attribute-stimulus format does not change contingent valuation results. Dominated alternatives increase the probability of paying in choice modeling | Versión del editor: | http://ipp.csic.es/es/workpaper/comparing-contingent-valuation-choice-modeling-using-field-eye-tracking-lab-data | URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10261/223268 |
Aparece en las colecciones: | (CCHS-IPP) Informes y documentos de trabajo |
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero | Descripción | Tamaño | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|---|
2014_01_ippwp_oviedocaparros.pdf | Documento de trabajo | 2,56 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizar/Abrir |
CORE Recommender
Page view(s)
110
checked on 23-abr-2024
Download(s)
260
checked on 23-abr-2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.