Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/204388
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Título

Risk assessment of chlorinated paraffins in feed and food

AutorSchrenk, Dieter; Bignami, Margherita; Bodin, Laurent; Chipman, James Kevin; Del Mazo, Jesús CSIC ORCID ; Grasl-Kraupp, Bettina; Hogstrand, Christer; Hoogenboom, Laurentius (Ron); Leblanc, Jean-Charles; Nebbia, Carlo Stefano; Ntzani, Evangelia; Petersen, Annette; Sand, Salomon; Schwerdtle, Tanja; Vleminckx, Christiane; Wallace, Heather; Brüschweiler, Beat; Leonards, Pim; Rose, Martin; Binaglia, Marco; Horvath, Zsuzsanna; Bordajandi, Luisa R. CSIC; Nielsen, Elsa
Palabras claveChlorinated paraffins
SCCP
MCCP
LCCP
Food
Feed
Risk assessment
Fecha de publicación19-dic-2019
EditorJohn Wiley & Sons
CitaciónEFSA Journal 18(3):5991 (2020)
ResumenThe European Commission asked EFSA for a scientific opinion on the risks for animal and human health related to the presence of chlorinated paraffins in feed and food. The data for experimental animals were reviewed and the CONTAM Panel identified the liver, kidney and thyroid as the target organs for the SCCP and MCCP mixtures tested in repeated dose toxicity studies. Decreased pup survival and subcutaneous haematoma/haemorrhage were also identified as critical effects for an MCCP mixture. For the LCCP mixtures tested, the liver was identified as the target organ. The Panel selected as reference points a BMDL10 of 2.3 mg/kg bw per day for increased incidence of nephritis in male rats, and of 36 mg/kg bw per day for increased relative kidney weights in male and female rats for SCCPs and MCCPs, respectively. For LCCPs, a reference point relevant for humans could not be identified. Due to the limitations in the toxicokinetic and toxicological database, the Panel concluded that derivation of a health-based guidance value was not appropriate. Only limited data on the occurrence of SCCPs and MCCPs in some fish species were submitted to EFSA. No data were submitted for LCCPs. Thus, a robust exposure assessment and consequently a complete risk characterisation could not be performed. A preliminary risk characterisation based only on the consumption of fish was performed, and the calculated margins of exposure suggested no health concern for this limited scenario. The Panel noted that dietary exposure will be higher due to the contribution of CPs from other foods. The Panel was not able to identify reference points for farm animals, horses and companion animals. No occurrence data for feed were submitted to EFSA.Therefore, no risk characterisation could be performed for any of these animal species.
Descripción220 p.-4 fig.-37 tab.-15 fig. compl.-16 tab. compl.-2 tab. append.
Versión del editorhttps://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.5991
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/204388
DOI10.2903/j.efsa.2020.5991
E-ISSN1831-4732
Aparece en las colecciones: (CIB) Artículos




Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
j_efsa_Schrenk_D_2020.pdf25,29 MBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo

CORE Recommender

PubMed Central
Citations

9
checked on 16-abr-2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

56
checked on 16-abr-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

36
checked on 22-feb-2024

Page view(s)

160
checked on 19-abr-2024

Download(s)

291
checked on 19-abr-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Artículos relacionados:


Este item está licenciado bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons