Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/198848
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Título

Antibiotic treatment of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli: an international ESCMID cross-sectional survey among infectious diseases specialists practicing in large hospitals

AutorPapst, L.; Beovic, Bojana; Pulcini, Céline; Durante-Mangoni, E.; Rodríguez-Baño, Jesús CSIC ORCID; Kaye, K. S.; Daikos, George; Raka, Lul; Paul, Mical
Palabras claveAcinetobacter baumannii
Carbapenem
Carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacilli
Combination therapy
Enterobacteriaceae
Polymyxin
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Survey
Fecha de publicaciónoct-2018
EditorElsevier
CitaciónClinical Microbiology and Infection 24(10): 1070-1076 (2018)
Resumen[Objectives] To explore contemporary antibiotic management of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria in hospitals.
[Methods] Cross-sectional, internet-based questionnaire survey. We contacted representatives of all hospitals with more than 800 acute-care hospital beds in France, Greece, Israel, Italy, Kosovo, Slovenia, Spain and selected hospitals in the USA. We asked respondents to describe the most common actual practice at their hospital regarding management of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa through close-ended questions.
[Results] Between January and June 2017, 115 of 141 eligible hospitals participated (overall response rate 81.6%, country-specific rates 66.7%–100%). Most were tertiary-care (99/114, 86.8%), university-affiliated (110/115, 89.1%) hospitals and most representatives were infectious disease specialists (99/115, 86.1%). Combination therapy was prescribed in 114/115 (99.1%) hospitals at least occasionally. Respondents were more likely to consider combination therapy when treating bacteraemia, pneumonia and central nervous system infections and for Enterobacteriaceae, P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii similarly. Combination of a polymyxin with a carbapenem was used in most cases, whereas combinations of a polymyxin with tigecycline, an aminoglycoside, fosfomycin or rifampicin were also common. Monotherapy was used for treatment of complicated urinary tract infections, usually with an aminoglycoside or a polymyxin. The intended goal of combination therapy was to improve the effectiveness of the treatment and to prevent development of resistance. In general, respondents shared the misconception that combination therapy is supported by strong scientific evidence.
[Conclusions] Combination therapy was the preferred treatment strategy for infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria among hospital representatives, even though high-quality evidence for carbapenem-based combination therapy is lacking.
DescripciónESGAP, ESGBIS, ESGIE and the CRGNB treatment survey study group.
Versión del editorhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2018.01.015
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/198848
DOI10.1016/j.cmi.2018.01.015
Identificadoresdoi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.01.015
e-issn: 1469-0691
issn: 1198-743X
Aparece en las colecciones: (IBIS) Artículos




Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
accesoRestringido.pdf15,38 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo

CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

60
checked on 17-abr-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

58
checked on 23-feb-2024

Page view(s)

193
checked on 19-abr-2024

Download(s)

20
checked on 19-abr-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.