Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/197010
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Título

Foraging, feeding, and physiological stress responses of wild wood mice to increased illumination and common genet cues

AutorNavarro-Castilla, Álvaro; Barja, Isabel; Díaz, Mario
Palabras clavePredator avoidance
Foraging
Feeding
Fecal predator cues
Common genets
Moonlight
Fecha de publicaciónago-2018
EditorOxford University Press
CitaciónCurrent Zoology 64(4): 409-417 (2018)
ResumenIn nature, animals are exposed to a broad range of threats imposed by predators, which may strongly influence the ecology of prey species directly or indirectly by affecting their behavior via fear of predation. Here, we studied wood mice Apodemus sylvaticus behavioral and physiological responses to simulated predation risk. Risk avoidance was analyzed by live trapping with control traps and traps treated with feces of common genet Genetta genetta (direct cue of risk) under new moon nights and following by simulated full moon conditions (indirect cue). The time devoted to foraging behavior and capture time were analyzed by video recording mice activity around traps. Food intake was calculated based on the amount of bait remaining in each trap. Fecal corticosterone metabolites (FCMs) were measured by enzyme-immunoassay as indicators of physiological stress responses. Fewer wood mice were captured during full moon, yet only non-breeding adult males clearly avoided common genet odor. Mice were captured sooner at night during the simulated full moon conditions and later in predator-treated traps. Foraging activity was lower when individuals faced predator’s feces, but neither food intake nor FCM levels were affected by predation risk cues. Direct and indirect cues of predation risk selectively affected wood mice behavior, although behavioral responses seem to be modulated by different costs–benefit balances related to the individual’s perception of risk. The lack of physiological responses to predation risk cues suggests that wood mice did not perceive them as reliable stressors or the response was too small or transient to be measured by FCM.
Versión del editorhttps://doi.org/10.1093/cz/zox048
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/197010
DOI10.1093/cz/zox048
ISSN1674-5507
E-ISSN2396-9814
Aparece en las colecciones: (MNCN) Artículos




Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
Foraging_Navarro_Art2018.pdf419,34 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo

CORE Recommender

PubMed Central
Citations

11
checked on 05-mar-2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

24
checked on 17-abr-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

22
checked on 24-feb-2024

Page view(s)

182
checked on 18-abr-2024

Download(s)

214
checked on 18-abr-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Artículos relacionados:


Este item está licenciado bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons