English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/189172
logo share SHARE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:


Beyond the security paradox: Ten criteria for a socially informed security policy

AuthorsPavone, Vincenzo ; Ball, Kirstie; Degli Esposti, Sara; Dibb, Sally; Santiago Gómez, Elvira
Public participation
Issue Date2018
PublisherSage Publications
CitationPublic Understanding of Science , vol. 27 , no. 6 , pp. 638-654 (2018)
AbstractThis article investigates the normative and procedural criteria adopted by European citizens to assess the acceptability of surveillance-oriented security technologies. It draws on qualitative data gathered at 12 citizen summits in nine European countries. The analysis identifies 10 criteria, generated by citizens themselves, for a socially informed security policy. These criteria not only reveal the conditions, purposes and operation rules that would make current European security policies and technologies more consistent with citizens’ priorities. They also cast light on an interesting paradox: although people feel safe in their daily lives, they believe security could, and should, be improved.
DescriptionCopyright © 2017, SAGE Publications This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created, accepted version manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version.
Publisher version (URL)https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662517702321
Appears in Collections:(CCHS-IPP) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Public_Understanding_of_Science_AM.pdf341,02 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Show full item record
Review this work

WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.