Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/181856
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Título

Modeling of High Nanoparticle Exposure in an Indoor Industrial Scenario with a One-Box Model

AutorRibalta, Carla CSIC ORCID; Koivisto, Antti J.; Salmatonidis, Apostolos CSIC ORCID; López-Lilao, Ana; Monfort, Eliseo; Viana, Mar CSIC ORCID
Palabras clavePrediction
Emission rates
Air exchange rate
Ultrafine particles
Unintentional nanoparticles
Worker exposure
Incidental nanoparticles
Particle mass concentration
Fecha de publicación14-may-2019
EditorMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
CitaciónInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
ResumenMass balance models have proved to be effective tools for exposure prediction in occupational settings. However, they are still not extensively tested in real-world scenarios, or for particle number concentrations. An industrial scenario characterized by high emissions of unintentionally-generated nanoparticles (NP) was selected to assess the performance of a one-box model. Worker exposure to NPs due to thermal spraying was monitored, and two methods were used to calculate emission rates: the convolution theorem, and the cyclic steady state equation. Monitored concentrations ranged between 4.2 × 104–2.5 × 105 cm−3. Estimated emission rates were comparable with both methods: 1.4 × 1011–1.2 × 1013 min−1 (convolution) and 1.3 × 1012–1.4 × 1013 min−1 (cyclic steady state). Modeled concentrations were 1.4-6 × 104 cm−3 (convolution) and 1.7–7.1 × 104 cm−3 (cyclic steady state). Results indicated a clear underestimation of measured particle concentrations, with ratios modeled/measured between 0.2–0.7. While both model parametrizations provided similar results on average, using convolution emission rates improved performance on a case-by-case basis. Thus, using cyclic steady state emission rates would be advisable for preliminary risk assessment, while for more precise results, the convolution theorem would be a better option. Results show that one-box models may be useful tools for preliminary risk assessment in occupational settings when room air is well mixed.
Versión del editorhttps://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16101695
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/181856
DOI10.3390/ijerph16101695
Aparece en las colecciones: (IDAEA) Artículos




Ficheros en este ítem:
Mostrar el registro completo

CORE Recommender

PubMed Central
Citations

6
checked on 23-mar-2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

13
checked on 11-abr-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

10
checked on 28-feb-2024

Page view(s)

193
checked on 18-abr-2024

Download(s)

147
checked on 18-abr-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Artículos relacionados:


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.