English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/181043
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:
Title

Response of different benthic habitats to off-shore fish cages

AuthorsRiera, Rodrigo; Becerro, Mikel ; Ramos, Eva; Monterroso, Óscar; Rodríguez, Myriam
KeywordsMacrofauna
Atlantic Ocean
Canary Islands
Sandy Seabeds
Fish Cages
Buffer Area
Seagrass
Issue DateJun-2015
PublisherWiley-VCH
CitationAquaculture Research 46(6): 1490-1500 (2015)
AbstractOff‐shore fish farming can increase the organic load of nearby coastal marine ecosystems due to the deposition of fish food and faeces on seabeds. Seagrass meadows are particularly affected by aquaculture activities but there are few empirical data showing differential effects of the same farming activity on multiple habitat types. Here, we assessed over a 2‐year period whether macrofaunal assemblages inhabiting sandy bare seabeds and Cymodocea nodosa meadows varied in their macrofaunal community structure to the fish farming activities. We observed high spatial and temporal variability in macrofauna composition and dynamics among seabed habitats and a limited impact of fish cages in their area of influence as compared with control areas. Seagrass meadows showed a higher abundance in macrofauna communities than sandy bare bottoms. Local marine currents could partially explain some results because of their influence on grain size composition. Differences in grain size resulted in higher abundances of the tanaid Apseudes talpa beneath fish cages and the absence of the sensitive amphipod Ampelisca brevicornis. Differences of resilience of seabeds (seagrass meadows and sandy bare bottoms) should be taken into account for environmental monitoring studies of off‐shore fish cages. Our results suggest that hydrodynamics are a key factor to determine buffer areas between fish cages and seagrass meadows.
Publisher version (URL)https://doi.org/10.1111/are.12306
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/181043
Identifiersdoi: 10.1111/are.12306
issn: 1355-557X
e-issn: 1365-2109
Appears in Collections:(IPNA) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
accesoRestringido.pdf15,38 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.