English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/179607
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:
Title

Pattern of trunk diameter fluctuations of almond trees in deficit irrigation scheduling during the first seasons

AuthorsMartín Palomo, Mª José; Corell González, M.; Girón Moreno, Ignacio F. ; Andreu Cáceres, L.; Trigo, E.; López-Moreno, Y. E.; Torrecillas Melendreras, Arturo ; Centeno, Ana; Pérez-López, D.; Moriana, Alfonso
KeywordsKernel filling
Maximum daily shrinkage
MDS
TGR
Trunk growth rate
Issue Date1-Jun-2019
PublisherElsevier
CitationAgricultural Water Management 218: 115-123 (2019)
AbstractIrrigation needs in mature almond orchards are very high. Although almond trees grow in rainfed conditions, the yield response is very sensitive to irrigation. Continuous monitoring of the water status could be an adequate tool to optimize deficit irrigation. In this sense, trunk diameter fluctuations appeared as a very promising indicator at the beginning of the century, but few data have been published. The aim of this work is to check threshold values of maximum daily shrikage (MDS) and identify possible limitations to their use in commercial orchards. The experiment was performed in a commercial farm in Dos Hermanas (Seville, Spain) during the 2017 season on a 7-years-old orchard (cv Vairo). The irrigation treatments were Control (100% ETc), sustained deficit irrigation (SDI) with a maximum seasonal irrigation of 100 mm and two regulated deficit treatments (RDI). Both RDI treatments (RDI-1 and RDI-2) were scheduled using the signal of maximum daily shrinkage (signal) and the midday stem water potential (SWP). In RDI-1, full irrigation conditions were provided before kernel filling and during postharvest, using the threshold values suggested in the bibliography. During kernel filling, the water stress level was designed to be -1.5 MPa (SWP) and 1.75 (signal). RDI-2 trees were irrigated using the same scheduling as RDI-1, but target water stress values were higher in kernel filling (-2 MPa and 2.75) and with a maximum seasonal amount of water of 100 mm. SWP in Control trees was near the McCutchan and Shackel baseline for most of the season. None of the deficit treatments reached the signal values suggested. Moreover, the signal values were almost equal between treatments, with no water stress effect. The trunk growth rate (TGR) presented clear differences depending on the water status.
Description9 páginas.-- 10 figuras.-- 3 tablas.-- 32 referencias
Publisher version (URL)http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.03.033
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/179607
DOI10.1016/j.agwat.2019.03.033
ISSN0378-3774
Appears in Collections:(IRNAS) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Pattern_trunk_diameter_fluctuations_2019_Preprint.pdf1,5 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work
 


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.