Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/176157
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Título

Combining Electrical Resistivity Tomography and Satellite Images for Improving Evapotranspiration Estimates of Citrus Orchards

AutorVanella, Daniela; Ramírez-Cuesta, Juan Miguel CSIC ORCID; Intrigliolo, Diego S. CSIC ORCID; Consoli, Simona
Palabras claveSentinel data
Near surface geophysics
Irrigation
Eddy covariance
Soil water balance
Fecha de publicación13-feb-2019
EditorMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
CitaciónRemote Sensing 11(4): 373 (2019)
ResumenAn adjusted satellite-based model was proposed with the aim of improving spatially distributed evapotranspiration (ET) estimates under plant water stress conditions. Remote sensing data and near surface geophysics information, using electrical resistivity tomography (ERT), were used in a revised version of the original dual crop coefficient (Kc) FAO-56 approach. Sentinel 2-A imagery were used to compute vegetation indices (VIs) required for spatially estimating ET. The potentiality of the ERT technique was exploited for tracking the soil wetting distribution patterns during and after irrigation phases. The ERT-derived information helped to accurately estimate the wet exposed fraction (few) and therefore the water evaporated from the soil surface into the dual Kc FAO-56 approach. Results, validated by site-specific ET measurements (ETEC) obtained using the eddy covariance (EC) technique, showed that ERT-adjusted ET estimates (ETERT) were considerably reduced (15%) when compared with the original dual Kc FAO-56 approach (ETFAO), soil evaporation overestimation being the main reason for these discrepancies. Nevertheless, ETFAO and ETERT showed overestimations of 64% and 40% compared to ETEC. This is because both approaches determine ET under standard conditions without water limitation, whereas EC is able to determine ET even under soil water deficit conditions. From the comparison between ETEC and ETERT, the water stress coefficient was experimentally derived, reaching a mean value for the irrigation season of 0.74. The obtained results highlight how new technologies for soil water status monitoring can be incorporated for improving ET estimations, particularly under drip irrigation conditions.
Versión del editorhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs11040373
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/176157
DOI10.3390/rs11040373
ISSN2072-4292
Aparece en las colecciones: (CEBAS) Artículos




Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
remotesensing-11-00373-v2.pdf6,92 MBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo

CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

25
checked on 29-mar-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

25
checked on 29-feb-2024

Page view(s)

302
checked on 14-abr-2024

Download(s)

207
checked on 14-abr-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Este item está licenciado bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons