Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/174019
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Título

Multimethod, multistate Bayesian hierarchical modeling approach for use in regional monitoring of wolves

AutorJiménez, José CSIC ORCID ; García, Emilio J.; Llaneza, Luis; Palacios, Vicente; González, Luis Mariano; García-Domínguez, Francisco; Muñoz-Igualada, Jaime; López-Bao, José V. CSIC ORCID
Palabras claveOptimización del monitoreo
Modelos bayesianos jerárquicos de ocupación de sitio
Toma de decisiones a escala del paisaje
Canis lupus
Marcaje territorial
Bayesian hierarchical-site-occupancy models
Canis lupus
Howling
Landscape-level decision mak-ing
Monitoring optimization
Wolf management
Wolf marks
Aullidos
Gestión de lobos
Fecha de publicación2016
EditorSociety for Conservation Biology
John Wiley & Sons
CitaciónConservation Biology 30(4): 883-893 (2016)
Resumen[EN]: In many cases, the first step in large-carnivore management is to obtain objective, reliable, and cost-effective estimates of population parameters through procedures that are reproducible over time. However, monitoring predators over large areas is difficult, and the data have a high level of uncertainty. We devised a practical multimethod and multistate modeling approach based on Bayesian hierarchical-site-occupancy models that combined multiple survey methods to estimate different population states for use in monitoring large predators at a regional scale. We used wolves (Canis lupus) as our model species and generated reliable estimates of the number of sites with wolf reproduction (presence of pups). We used 2 wolf data sets from Spain (Western Galicia in 2013 and Asturias in 2004) to test the approach. Based on howling surveys, the naïve estimation (i.e., estimate based only on observations) of the number of sites with reproduction was 9 and 25 sites in Western Galicia and Asturias, respectively. Our model showed 33.4 (SD 9.6) and 34.4 (3.9) sites with wolf reproduction, respectively. The number of occupied sites with wolf reproduction was 0.67 (SD 0.19) and 0.76 (0.11), respectively. This approach can be used to design more cost-effective monitoring programs (i.e., to define the sampling effort needed per site). Our approach should inspire well-coordinated surveys across multiple administrative borders and populations and lead to improved decision making for management of large carnivores on a landscape level. The use of this Bayesian framework provides a simple way to visualize the degree of uncertainty around population-parameter estimates and thus provides managers and stakeholders an intuitive approach to interpreting monitoring results. Our approach can be widely applied to large spatial scales in wildlife monitoring where detection probabilities differ between population states and where several methods are being used to estimate different population parameters.
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/174019
DOI10.1111/cobi.12685
Identificadoresdoi: 10.1111/cobi.12685
issn: 0888-8892
e-issn: 1523-1739
Aparece en las colecciones: (IREC) Artículos




Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
accesoRestringido.pdf15,38 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo

CORE Recommender

PubMed Central
Citations

3
checked on 05-abr-2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

15
checked on 24-abr-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

14
checked on 23-feb-2024

Page view(s)

187
checked on 21-abr-2024

Download(s)

70
checked on 21-abr-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Artículos relacionados:


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.