English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/173597
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:


Accuracy assessment of digital terrain model dataset sources for hydrogeomorphological modelling in small mediterranean catchments

AuthorsGraf, Lukas; Moreno-de-las-Heras, Mariano ; Ruiz, Maurici; Calsamiglia, Aleix; García-Comendador, Julián; Fortesa, Josep; López-Tarazón, José A.; Estrany, Joan
KeywordsDigital terrain models
DTM vertical accuracy
DTM comparison
Hydrogeomorphological modelling
Mediterranean catchments
Issue Date12-Dec-2018
PublisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
CitationRemote Sensing 10(12): 2014 (2018)
AbstractDigital terrain models (DTMs) are a fundamental source of information in Earth sciences. DTM-based studies, however, can contain remarkable biases if limitations and inaccuracies in these models are disregarded. In this work, four freely available datasets, including Shuttle Radar Topography Mission C-Band Synthetic Aperture Radar (SRTM C-SAR V3 DEM), Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer Global Digital Elevation Map (ASTER GDEM V2), and two nationwide airborne light detection and ranging (LiDAR)-derived DTMs (at 5-m and 1-m spatial resolution, respectively) were analysed in three geomorphologically contrasting, small (3–5 km2) catchments located in Mediterranean landscapes under intensive human influence (Mallorca Island, Spain). Vertical accuracy as well as the influence of each dataset’s characteristics on hydrological and geomorphological modelling applicability were assessed by using ground-truth data, classic geometric and morphometric parameters, and a recently proposed index of sediment connectivity. Overall vertical accuracy—expressed as the root mean squared error (RMSE) and normalised median deviation (NMAD)—revealed the highest accuracy for the 1-m (RMSE = 1.55 m; NMAD = 0.44 m) and 5-m LiDAR DTMs (RMSE = 1.73 m; NMAD = 0.84 m). Vertical accuracy of the SRTM data was lower (RMSE = 6.98 m; NMAD = 5.27 m), but considerably higher than for the ASTER data (RMSE = 16.10 m; NMAD = 11.23 m). All datasets were affected by systematic distortions. Propagation of these errors and coarse horizontal resolution caused negative impacts on flow routing, stream network, and catchment delineation, and to a lower extent, on the distribution of slope values. These limitations should be carefully considered when applying DTMs for catchment hydrogeomorphological modelling.
Publisher version (URL)https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10122014
Appears in Collections:(IDAEA) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
remotesensing-10-02014-v2.pdf3,12 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Show full item record
Review this work

Related articles:

WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.