English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/173092
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:
Title

At the intersection of medical geography and disease ecology: Mirko Grmek, Jacques May and the concept of pathocenosis

AuthorsArrizabalaga, Jon
KeywordsDisease ecology
Medical geography
History of diseases
Historical epidemiology
Pathocenosis
School of the Annales
Mirko D. Grmek
Jacques M. May
Fernand Braudel
Issue Date2018
PublisherSpringer
CitationHistory and Philosophy of the Life Sciences (40/4) : Article:71 (2018)
AbstractEnvironmental historians are not sufficiently aware of the extent to which mid twentieth-century thinkers turned to medical geography—originally a nineteenth-century area of study—in order to think through ideas of ecology, environment, and historical reasoning. This article outlines how the French–Croatian Mirko D. Grmek (Krapina, 1924–Paris, 2000), a major thinker of his generation in the history of medicine, used those ideas in his studies of historical epidemiology. During the 1960s, Grmek attempted to provide, in the context of the Annales School’s research program under the leadership of Fernand Braudel, a new theoretical framework for a world history of disease. Its development was inspired by several sources, most notably the French–American Jacques M. May (Paris 1896–Tunisia, 1975), who was then pioneering an opening up of medical geography and movement towards the concept of disease ecology. The cornerstone of Grmek’s “synthetic approach” to the field was the notion of “pathocenosis”. The diverse uses of this notion in the course of time—from his early agenda focused on a longue durée history of diseases in Western Antiquity to his last, relating to the new epidemiological threat of (re)emerging infectious diseases, specifically HIV/aids—enables us firstly, to note how concepts of ecology sat uneasily alongside those of medical geography; secondly, to assess the reach and limits of his theoretical contribution to historical epidemiology; and thirdly, to understand better the uneven fortunes of his concept of pathocenosis at the end of the twentieth and beginning of the twenty-first centuries.
DescriptionDentro de la colección temática: "Microbes, Networks, Knowledge: Disease Ecology in the 20th Century"
Publisher version (URL)https://link.springer.com/epdf/10.1007/s40656-018-0236-8
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-018-0236-8
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs40656-018-0236-8
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/173092
DOI10.1007/s40656-018-0236-8
ISSN0391-9714
E-ISSN1742-6316
Appears in Collections:(IMF) Artículos
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show full item record
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.