Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/172132
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
SHARE CORE BASE | |
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE | |
Título: | Negotiating local versus global needs in the International Long Term Ecological Research Network’s socio-ecological research agenda |
Autor: | Holzer, J.M.; Adamescu, M.C.; Bonet-García, Francisco J. CSIC; Díaz-Delgado, Ricardo CSIC ORCID ; Dick, J.; Grove, J.M.; Rozzi, R.; Orenstein, D.E. | Palabras clave: | Long-term ecological research Long-term socio-ecological research Transdisciplinary Network Sustainability ILTER Global research infrastructure |
Fecha de publicación: | 2018 | Editor: | Institute of Physics Publishing | Citación: | Environmental Research Letters, 13 (2018) 105003 | Resumen: | Over the past decade, long-term socio-ecological research (LTSER) has been established to better integrate social science research and societal concerns into the goals and objectives of the International Long-Term Ecological Research (ILTER) network, an established global network of long-term ecologicalmonitoring sites. TheHorizon 2020 eLTER project, currently underway, includes as one of its key objectives to evaluate the performance of LTSER platforms.This article reflects part of this evaluation: six LTSER platformswere assessed through site visits of the lead author, coupledwith reflections and insights of the platform managers, whoare also co-authors.We provide background for the mission and goals of LTSER, then assess the six international LTSERplatforms—Baltimore Ecosystem Study LTER, USA; Braila Island LTSER, Romania; Cairngorms LTSER, UK;Doñana LTSER, Spain;OmoraEthnobotanical Park CapeHorn LTER,Chile; and Sierra Nevada LTSER, Spain. While based on a strong theoretical foundation in socio-ecological research, there has been a steep learning curve for scientists applying the concept in practice at LTSERplatforms.We show positive impacts that have been achieved, including contributions to policy, land-use planning, and natural resourcemanagement.Weexplain key aspects of LTSERplatforms that have proven challenging, includingmanagement, interdisciplinary integration, and stakeholder collaboration.Wecharacterize the tensions between top-down desires for network harmonization, bottom-up demands such as local policy relevance, and platform-level constraints such as time and budget. Finally,we discuss challenges, such as local context dominating the character of LTSERplatforms, and the fact that scientists are often disincentivized from engaging in transdisciplinary science. Overall, we conclude that while the internationalnetwork offers important advantages to itsmembers, a more productive balance between local and global goals could be achieved, and membersmay need to temper their expectations of what the network can and cannot offer at the local level. | Versión del editor: | https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aadec8 | URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10261/172132 | DOI: | 10.1088/1748-9326/aadec8 |
Aparece en las colecciones: | (EBD) Artículos |
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero | Descripción | Tamaño | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Holzer_2018_Environ._Res._Lett._13_105003.pdf | 1,71 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizar/Abrir |
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
19
checked on 23-abr-2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
13
checked on 24-feb-2024
Page view(s)
210
checked on 23-abr-2024
Download(s)
173
checked on 23-abr-2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Altmetric
Este item está licenciado bajo una Licencia Creative Commons