English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/16244
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:

Title

Recapture processes and biological inference in monitoring burrow-nesting seabirds

AuthorsSanz-Aguilar, Ana ; Tavecchia, Giacomo ; Mínguez, Eduardo; Massa, Bruno; Lo Valvo, Fabio; Ballesteros, Gustavo A.; González Barberá, Gonzalo ; Amengual, José Francisco; Rodríguez, Ana ; McMinn, Miguel; Oro, Daniel
KeywordsCapture–recapture analysis
Monitoring scheme
Procellariiformes
Survival probability
Transients
Issue Date25-Jul-2009
PublisherSpringer
CitationJournal of Ornithology 151(1): 133-146 (2010)
AbstractCapture–mark–recapture methods are used widely for monitoring and diagnosis of bird populations as they permit robust estimates of population abundance and demographic parameters (e.g. survival) to be obtained from incomplete records of individual life histories. The statistical analysis of these data relies on the important assumption that individuals of the same local populations (i.e. colony) have the same parameters (the homogeneity assumption). We used data from six medium- to long-term monitoring schemes of local Mediterranean populations of the European Storm Petrel Hydrobates pelagicus to empirically show that the level of individual heterogeneity and the consequent bias in the parameter of interest depend on the recapture methodology, which has important consequences for the experimental design. We found that the recapture probability varied over time and among methodologies. The study design had a strong influence on the proportion of transients caught (i.e. individuals not recaptured after marking); however, the survival probability estimate for resident birds was fairly similar across the studies. The differences found in survival seem to depend on the biological variability between sites (e.g. predation pressure), and not on the recapture methods.
Publisher version (URL)http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10336-009-0435-x
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/16244
DOI10.1007/s10336-009-0435-x
ISSN0021-8375
E-ISSN1439-0361
Appears in Collections:(CEBAS) Artículos
(IMEDEA) Artículos
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show full item record
Review this work
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.