English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/161861
logo share SHARE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:


Indicators of endogamy and reciprocity in PhD theses assessments

AuthorsCastelló-Cogollos, Lourdes; Aleixandre-Benavent, Rafael ; Castelló-Cogollos, Rafael
Issue Date2016
PublisherUniversidad Politécnica de Valencia
CitationProceedings of the 21st International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators: 1487-1490 (2016)
AbstractIn Spain, in the evaluation of the theses several academics contribute: supervisors, chairs and memberships of the academic assessment boards (AAB). Supervisors propose members of AAB and the PhD commissions from universities select these academics as members of the definitive AAB. This fact generates evident relationships between members that can be analysed and measured using indicators. Our objective is to propose indicators describing relations between supervisors involved in the academic assessment in the Spanish theses. These indicators, when applied to a complete set of theses in a specific field, can provide insights on relations of patronage and academic power between academics and contribute to drawn a picture of the field structure from a sociological point of view.
DescriptionTrabajo presentado a la 21st International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators: "Peripheries, frontiers and beyond", celebrada en Valencia (España) del 14 al 16 de septiembre de 2016.
Identifiersisbn: 978-84-9048-519-4
Appears in Collections:(INGENIO) Libros y partes de libros
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
indiSTIasses.pdf389,71 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Show full item record
Review this work

WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.