Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/15984
Share/Export:
![]() ![]() |
|
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE | |
Title: | Evaluation of the surface renewal method to estimate wheat evapotranspiration |
Authors: | Zapata Ruiz, Nery CSIC ORCID ; Martínez-Cob, Antonio CSIC | Keywords: | Water requirements Wheat Energy balance |
Issue Date: | Jun-2002 | Publisher: | Elsevier | Citation: | Agricultural Water Management, Volume 55, Issue 2, 14 June 2002, Pages 141-157 | Abstract: | The performance of the surface renewal method to estimate latent heat fluxes (LE) over a wheat crop was evaluated by comparison against values of LE measured independently using a weighing lysimeter. High-frequency temperature readings were taken at 1.5 m above ground from 29 April to 7 June 2000 over a 0.7–0.8 m high wheat crop. Surface renewal analysis was applied for two time lags r (0.75 and 0.25 s) to estimate half-hour sensible heat flux (H) and, subsequently, LE by solving the energy balance equation, using concurrent measurements of net radiation and soil heat flux. When H was estimated using sensor measurement height (z) in the computations, indices of agreement (IA) between lysimeter and surface renewal LE were above 0.94 and relative errors varied between 8.5 and 14.9% for time lag r=0.75 s for all analyzed days but 7 June. Results were slightly poorer for time lag r=0.25 s. When z−hc or z−d (hc being the crop height and d being the zero plane displacement) were used instead of z to compute H, surface renewal LE estimates slightly improved, particularly for the z−d case. The improvement was particularly noticeable for 7 June. The use of z−hc or z−d was thus more appropriate for these measurements, with the result that it was not necessary to calibrate the weighing factor α, as required by the standard surface renewal method. Unfortunately, although of similar magnitude than those reported for other micrometeorological methods, surface renewal errors found in this paper were biased and LE was underestimated. Further research and testing of the surface renewal method is therefore required to remove biases from the estimates of LE. | Description: | The definitive version is available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/03783774 | Publisher version (URL): | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3774(01)00188-3 | URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10261/15984 | DOI: | 10.1016/S0378-3774(01)00188-3 | ISSN: | 0378-3774 |
Appears in Collections: | (EEAD) Artículos |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
McobA_AgricWatManag_2002.pdf | 153,09 kB | Adobe PDF | ![]() View/Open |
Review this work
SCOPUSTM
Citations
18
checked on May 23, 2022
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
18
checked on May 22, 2022
Page view(s)
327
checked on May 25, 2022
Download(s)
300
checked on May 25, 2022
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Dimensions
WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.