English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/158067
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJiménez, Franciscoes_ES
dc.contributor.authorRiojano-Delgado, Antonia M.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorFernández-Moreno, Pablo T.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez-Suárez, Cristinaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorAtienza, Sergio G.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorPrado, R. deles_ES
dc.date.accessioned2017-12-11T12:12:32Z-
dc.date.available2017-12-11T12:12:32Z-
dc.date.issued2016-09-
dc.identifier.citationPhysiologia Plantarum 158(1): 2-10 (2016)es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0031-9317-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/158067-
dc.description.abstractThe Clearfield® wheat cultivars possessing imidazolinone (IMI)-resistant traits provide an efficient option for controlling weeds. The imazamox-resistant cultivar Pantera (Clearfield®) was compared with a susceptible cultivar (Gazul). Target and non-target mechanisms of resistance were studied to characterize the resistance of Pantera and to identify the importance of each mechanism involved in this resistance. Pantera is resistant to imazamox as was determined in previous experiments. The molecular study confirmed that it carries a mutation Ser-Asn627 conferring resistance to imazamox in two out of three acetolactate synthase (ALS) genes (imi1 and imi2), located in wheat on chromosomes 6B and 6D, respectively. However, the last gene (imi3) located on chromosome 6A does not carry any mutation conferring resistance. As a result, photosynthetic activity and chlorophyll content were reduced after imazamox treatment. Detoxification was higher in the resistant biotype as shown by metabolomic study while imazamox translocation was higher in the susceptible cultivar. Interestingly, imazamox metabolism was higher at higher doses of herbicide, which suggests that the detoxification process is an inducible mechanism in which the upregulation of key gene coding for detoxification enzymes could play an important role. Thus, the identification of cultivars with a higher detoxification potential would allow the development of more resistant varieties.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipWe thank Rafael A. Roldán-Gómez for his technical help and the ‘Asociación de Agroquímicos y Mediamabiente’ for supporting this work.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sonses_ES
dc.rightsclosedAccesses_ES
dc.titlePhysiological, biochemical and molecular characterization of an induced mutation conferring imidazolinone resistance in wheates_ES
dc.typeArtículoes_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ppl.12445-
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer reviewedes_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.12445es_ES
dc.identifier.e-issn1399-3054-
dc.contributor.funderAsociación de Agroquímicos y Medio Ambiente (España)es_ES
dc.relation.csices_ES
oprm.item.hasRevisionno ko 0 false*
Appears in Collections:(IAS) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
accesoRestringido.pdf15,38 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.