English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/157908
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMateos, Lucianoes_ES
dc.contributor.authorAraus, José Luises_ES
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-30T12:50:38Z-
dc.date.available2017-11-30T12:50:38Z-
dc.date.issued2016-01-31-
dc.identifier.citationAgricultural Water Management 164(Part 1): 190-196 (2016)es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0378-3774-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/157908-
dc.description.abstractIn water-scarce environments, water conservation is a means to increase agricultural production and preserve the environment. Water conservation can be approached at different scales with different objectives. Water productivity (the ratio between crop production and water use or water consumption) is increased by reducing non-beneficial use and by regulating water applications as to reduce transpiration in smaller proportion than yield. Water productivity can also be modified through other agronomical practices and breeding. The consumptive use coefficient (consumptive use to supply ratio) can be enhanced through various engineering solutions that reduce the use of irrigation water and energy although they do not necessarily reduce consumptive use. Therefore, engineering solutions for water conservation at farm level do not imply basin-scale water conservation. However, agronomical solutions such as regulated deficit irrigation are directly linked to basin water conservation because they goal is to reduce transpiration with little or no yield penalty. Optimising water productivity is a plausible goal in some situations; however, in others it clashes with profit maximization, food production and food security. Concerning breeding, past evidence shows that except for very harsh environments, selection for greater transpiration efficiency, evaluated physiologically as the ratio of photosynthetic assimilation versus transpiration or indirectly through the stable carbon isotope signature of plant dry matter, may have a negative effect by limiting yield potential as well as productivity under a wide range of water stress conditions.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipContribution of J.L. Araus was supported in part by the Spanish Project AGL2013-44147-R.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.relationMINECO/ICTI2013-2016/AGL2013-44147-Res_ES
dc.rightsclosedAccesses_ES
dc.subjectWater productivityes_ES
dc.subjectTranspiration efficiencyes_ES
dc.subjectWater usees_ES
dc.subjectWater consumptiones_ES
dc.titleHydrological, engineering, agronomical, breeding and physiological pathways for the effective and efficient use of water in agriculturees_ES
dc.typeartículoes_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.agwat.2015.10.017-
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer reviewedes_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2015.10.017es_ES
dc.contributor.funderMinisterio de Economía y Competitividad (España)es_ES
dc.relation.csices_ES
oprm.item.hasRevisionno ko 0 false*
dc.identifier.funderhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003329es_ES
Appears in Collections:(IAS) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
accesoRestringido.pdf15,38 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.