English   español  
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/154504
Compartir / Impacto:
Estadísticas
Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE
Citado 0 veces en Web of Knowledge®  |  Ver citas en Google académico
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar otros formatos: Exportar EndNote (RIS)Exportar bibText (RIS)Exportar csv (RIS)
Título

Assessing low-pressure solid-set sprinkler irrigation in maize

Autor Robles Rovelo, Octavio; Cavero Campo, José ; Playán Jubillar, Enrique ; Zapata Ruiz, Nery
Palabras clave Solid-set
Sprinkler irrigation
Energy efficiency
Low pressure sprinklers
Maize yield
Fecha de publicación sep-2017
EditorElsevier
Citación Robles O, Cavero J, Playán E, Zapata N. Assessing low-pressure solid-set sprinkler irrigation in maize. Agricultural Water Management 191: 37-49 (2017)
ResumenWater and energy are limited and expensive resources. Conserving water and energy is a requirement to ensure the viability of modern pressurized irrigation systems. The objective of this research was to analyze the possibilities of reducing the nozzle operating pressure of impact sprinklers from 300 kPa (standard pressure) to 200 kPa (low pressure) in solid-set irrigation systems without reducing the sprinkler spacing and maintaining crop yield. Three treatments resulting from combinations of sprinkler type, and working pressure were analyzed: 1) Conventional impact sprinkler operating at 300 kPa (CIS300); 2) Conventional impact sprinkler operating at 200 kPa (CIS200); and 3) Modified deflecting plate impact sprinkler operating at 200 kPa (DPIS200). A randomized experimental design was applied to a maize crop during two seasons (2015 and 2016). Irrigation performance was measured by catch-can monitoring at one replicate of each treatment. Maize growth, yield and its components were measured. Differences between treatments in soil water, maize growth and yield variables were analyzed using ANOVA. Seasonal irrigation uniformity evaluated at the top of the canopy was larger for the standard pressure treatment (93%) than for the low pressure treatments (82% and 84% for DPIS200 and CIS200, respectively). The average wind drift and evaporation losses for the 2016 irrigation season were higher for the CIS300 treatment (17%) than for the low pressure treatments, DPIS200 (15%) and CIS200 (13%). Low pressure treatments did not reduce grain yield compared with the standard pressure treatment. Differences in irrigation performance and maize yield between the low pressure treatments, DPIS200 and CIS200, were not statistically significant. The reduction in energy use by reducing the operating pressure from 300 kPa to 200 kPa would allow to increase the net farming benefit of individual and collective systems. This is particularly true if low pressure irrigation is considered at the design phase of the irrigation system.
Descripción 42 Pags.- 5 Tabls.- 8 Figs. The definitive version is available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/03783774
Versión del editorhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2017.06.001
URI http://hdl.handle.net/10261/154504
DOI10.1016/j.agwat.2017.06.001
ISSN0378-3774
Aparece en las colecciones: (EEAD) Artículos
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
ZapataN_AgricWatManag_2017.pdf Embargado hasta 1 de octubre de 20191,12 MBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir     Petición de una copia
Mostrar el registro completo
 



NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.