English   español  
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/15291
Compartir / Impacto:
Estadísticas
Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE
Ver citas en Google académico
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar otros formatos: Exportar EndNote (RIS)Exportar EndNote (RIS)Exportar EndNote (RIS)
Título

Academic book reviews in English and Spanish: Is “giving reasons for critical comments” a universal politeness strategy?

Autor Moreno, Ana I.; Suárez, Lorena
Palabras clave Academic journal book reviews
Critical comments
Face-threatening acts
Giving reasons
Politeness
Mitigation strategies
Crosscultural academic discourse analysis
Contrastive rhetoric
English
Spanish
Fecha de publicación 24-jul-2009
ResumenIn academic journal book reviewing, critical comments on the book under review (henceforth critical comments) can be considered potential face-threatening acts (FTAs). Given the especial interpersonal conflict potentially caused by assessing the work written by a peer in a public context, it may be wise for reviewers to mitigate their force. In the present paper we focus on a politeness strategy, i.e. giving reasons, which commonly serves reviewers to redress the force of the FTA potentially caused. We aim to provide insight into the extent to which scholars from different but comparable writing cultures justify their critical comments with supporting reasons, thus helping them to manage the potential interpersonal conflict created. Our empirical comparison is based on two comparable corpora of academic book reviews of literature, 20 written in Anglo-American English, and 20 in Castilian Spanish. The results show that, while reviewers in the two corpora offer a substantial amount of unjustified critical comments, these are proportionally more frequent in the Spanish corpus. Also, while the Anglo-American reviewers are more inclined to justify negative critical comments than positive ones, this tendency is opposite for the Castilian Spanish reviewers. A semi-structured e-mail questionnaire is piloted to see whether responses from reviewers to an open-ended question on these issues could reveal any explanatory information. Implications for English for Academic Purposes are drawn.
Descripción Forthcoming book chapter
URI http://hdl.handle.net/10261/15291
ISSNForthcoming
Aparece en las colecciones: (CCHS-IEDCYT) Libros y partes de libros
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
Moreno_Suarez_giving_reasons_abstract_July_09.pdf12,64 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo
 


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.