English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/152834
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:

Title

Alternatives to Peer Review: Novel Approaches for Research Evaluation

AuthorsBirukou, Aliaksandr; Osman, Nardine ; Sierra, Carles ; Wassef, Aalam
Issue Date14-Dec-2011
PublisherFrontiers Media
CitationFront. Comput. Neurosci. 5: 56 (2011)
AbstractIn this paper we review several novel approaches for research evaluation. We start with a brief overview of the peer review, its controversies, and metrics for assessing efficiency and overall quality of the peer review. We then discuss five approaches, including reputation-based ones, that come out of the research carried out by the LiquidPub project and research groups collaborated with LiquidPub. Those approaches are alternative or complementary to traditional peer review. We discuss pros and cons of the proposed approaches and conclude with a vision for the future of the research evaluation, arguing that no single system can suit all stakeholders in various communities.
Publisher version (URL)http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2011.00056
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/152834
DOI10.3389/fncom.2011.00056
ISSN1662-5188
Appears in Collections:(IIIA) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Alternatives to Peer Review.pdf689,55 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.