Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/148776
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorHernández-Pliego, Jesús-
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez, Carlos-
dc.contributor.authorBustamante, Javier-
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-25T06:03:07Z-
dc.date.available2017-04-25T06:03:07Z-
dc.date.issued2017-04-25-
dc.identifier.citationMovement Ecology 5(1): 8 (2017)-
dc.identifier.issn2051-3933-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/148776-
dc.description.abstract[Background] In species with biparental care both members of the breeding pair cooperate to raise the offspring either by assisting each other in every reproductive task or by specializing in different ones. The latter case is known as reproductive role specialization. Raptors are considered one of the most role-specialized groups, but little is known about parental behavior away from the nest. Until the advent of biologgers, avian role specialization was traditionally studied with direct observations at the nest because of the difficulties of following and recording the behavior of free-ranging individuals. In this paper we analyze how the role specialization of the lesser kestrel (Falco naumanni) influences foraging movement patterns throughout the breeding season. We tracked 30 lesser kestrel breeders from two breeding colonies using high-frequency GPS-dataloggers during four consecutive breeding seasons.-
dc.description.abstract[Results] We found no differences between sexes in lesser kestrel foraging movements early in the breeding season before the formation of the breeding pair. However, we observed sexually distinct foraging movement strategies later in the breeding season once breeding pairs were formed. Lesser kestrel males performed a large number of short foraging trips while females made a few long ones. This maximized the provisioning rate by males to feed their mates and offspring. Meanwhile, lesser kestrel females spent more time at the colony than males in order to defend the nest, incubate the eggs and brood the nestlings. Females also helped their mates to provision the nestling once these had grown and required more food and less protection. Furthermore, lesser kestrels showed a sexual spatial segregation in foraging areas, with males foraging closer to the colony than females.-
dc.description.abstract[Conclusions] The lesser kestrel responds to changes in energy demand throughout the breeding season with its foraging movement strategy, but in a different way depending on parental sex. The sexual spatial segregation observed is likely to be the result of an adaptive foraging strategy based on role specialization to reduce prey depletion close to the colony and intersexual competition in order to improve breeding success.-
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was funded by “HORUS” (ref: P09-RNM-04588), Consejería de Innovación, Ciencia y Empresa of the Junta de Andalucía, by “KESTREL-MOVE” (ref: CGL2016-79249-P), Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad MINECO, Spain (both projects received FEDER funds from the European Union), and by “Migratory decisions in a changing world: mechanisms and drivers of changing migratory behaviour”, NERC standard grants, United Kindgdom. J. Hernández-Pliego and C. Rodríguez were supported by JAE-predoc and a JAE-doc fellowships, respectively, co-funded by the Spanish National Research Council and the European Social Fund. The funders had no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.-
dc.publisherBioMed Central-
dc.relation-
dc.relation.isversionofPublisher's version-
dc.rightsopenAccess-
dc.subjectFalco naumanni-
dc.subjectRole specialization-
dc.subjectForaging behavior-
dc.subjectSpatial segregation-
dc.subjectMovement ecology-
dc.subjectBreeding ecology-
dc.subjectGPS-
dc.subjectBiologging-
dc.titleA few long versus many short foraging trips: different foraging strategies of lesser kestrel sexes during breeding-
dc.typeartículo-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s40462-017-0100-6-
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40462-017-0100-6-
dc.date.updated2017-04-25T06:03:08Z-
dc.language.rfc3066en-
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s).-
dc.rights.licensehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.contributor.funderJunta de Andalucía-
dc.contributor.funderMinisterio de Economía y Competitividad (España)-
dc.contributor.funderEuropean Commission-
dc.contributor.funderConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (España)-
dc.identifier.funderhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003329es_ES
dc.identifier.funderhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000780es_ES
dc.identifier.funderhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003339es_ES
dc.identifier.funderhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100011011es_ES
dc.identifier.pmid28451434-
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501es_ES
item.openairetypeartículo-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Aparece en las colecciones: (EBD) Artículos
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
40462_2017_Article_100.pdf1,75 MBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Show simple item record

CORE Recommender

PubMed Central
Citations

3
checked on 17-abr-2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

21
checked on 15-abr-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

17
checked on 25-feb-2024

Page view(s)

307
checked on 19-abr-2024

Download(s)

224
checked on 19-abr-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Artículos relacionados:


Este item está licenciado bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons