English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/148707
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:

Title

Planktonic protistan communities in lakes along a large-scale environmental gradient

AuthorsKhomich, Maryia; Kauserud, Håvard; Logares, Ramiro ; Rasconi, Serena; Andersen, Tom
KeywordsPlanktonic
Protists
Oligotrophic lakes
Diversity
Longitudinal gradient
454 pyrosequencing
Issue DateApr-2017
PublisherFederation of European Microbiological Societies
CitationFEMS Microbiology Ecology 93(4): fiw231 (2017)
AbstractDespite their obvious importance, our knowledge about the eukaryotic microbial diversity of inland waters is still limited and poorly documented. We applied 18S rDNA amplicon sequencing to provide a comprehensive analysis of eukaryotic diversity in 74 low-productivity lakes along a 750 km longitudinal transect (5.40-18.52°E) across southern Scandinavia. We detected a wide diversity of pelagic microbial eukaryotes, classified into 1882 operational taxonomic units (OTUs). The highest OTU richness was found in traditional phytoplankton groups like Dinoflagellata, Chrysophyceae, Chlorophyta and Cryptophyta. A total of 53.6% OTUs were primarily autotrophic, while 19.4% of the heterotrophic OTUs belonged to putative parasitic taxa. Except for a longitudinal trend in the relative influence of mixotrophs, there were no significant associations between major functional groups (autotrophs, heterotrophs and parasites) and spatial and environmental variables. Community dissimilarity increased significantly with increasing geographical distance between lakes. In accordance with earlier, microscopy-based surveys in this region, we demonstrate distinct gradients in protistan diversity and community composition, which are better explained by spatial structure than local environment. The strong association between longitude and protistan diversity is probably better explained by differences in regional species pools due to differences in landscape productivity than by dispersal limitation or climatic constraints
Description13 pages, 5 figures, supplementary data https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiw231
Publisher version (URL)https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiw231
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/148707
DOI10.1093/femsec/fiw231
Identifiersdoi: 10.1093/femsec/fiw231
issn: 0168-6496
e-issn: 1574-6941
Appears in Collections:(ICM) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Khomich_et_al_2017_postprint.pdf4,18 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Khomich_et_al_2017_Suppl_postprint.pdf2,92 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.