English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/144038
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCouto-Váquez, A.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorGonzález, S.J.es_ES
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-15T15:30:24Z-
dc.date.available2017-02-15T15:30:24Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Journal of Forest Research 133: 631-637 (2014)es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1612-4669 (-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/144038-
dc.description.abstractIn a 12-year-old Pinus radiata plantation, three dominant and three suppressed trees removed by thinning were randomly selected, and needles, annual rings from basal stem disks and bark were collected and analysed to study the relationships of climate, tree age, dominance and growth with tree 15N. The high foliar-N concentration (1.35-2.73 % N, dw) suggested that N was not limiting tree growth, therefore allowing plants to fractionate versus 15N, leading to differences in 15N among trees. Most wood 15Nair values were below the 15Nair natural abundance in the dominant pines (-2.43 to +1.69 ‰) and above it in the suppressed trees (+0.73 to +3.35 ‰), likely due to the access of dominants to exogenous N sources with lower 15Nair than those of suppressed. However, no dominance effect was detected in 15Nair of bark and needles that decreased in the order: buds (+1.20 to +2.44 ‰) > needles 1-year (-0.27 to +1.43 ‰) > needles 2-years (-0.97 to +0.41 ‰) > bark (-1.18 to +0.15 ‰). Compared with the soil N in the 0-15 cm layer (15Nair= +4.8 ‰), all plant material was 15N-depleted. Results suggest that seedlings and foliar buds have a less efficient system for N conservation and recycling, with higher losses. The linear regression models showed that both biotic (dominance and tree age) and abiotic factors (temperature in spring-summer and annual precipitation) are needed to explain the wood 15Nair satisfactorily.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherSpringeres_ES
dc.rightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.subjectbarkes_ES
dc.subjectneedleses_ES
dc.subjecttree ringses_ES
dc.subjectPinus radiataes_ES
dc.subjectwoodes_ES
dc.titleEffects of biotic and abiotic factors on 15N in young Pinus radiata.es_ES
dc.typeartículoes_ES
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer reviewedes_ES
dc.relation.publisherversiondoi:10.1007/s10342-014-0791-9es_ES
dc.identifier.e-issn1612-4677-
dc.relation.csices_ES
oprm.item.hasRevisionno ko 0 false*
Appears in Collections:(IIAG) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Couto-Vazquez_Gonzalez-Prieto_2014_EJFR_133_631-637.pdf488,42 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record
 


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.