English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/142232
logo share SHARE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChinchilla-Rodríguez, Zaidaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorMiguel, Sandraes_ES
dc.contributor.authorPerianes-Rodríguez, Antonioes_ES
dc.descriptionChinchilla-Rodríguez, Zaida; Miguel, Sandra; Perianes-Rodríguez, Antonio. (2016). Measuring research performance in international collaboration. 14th International Congress of Information, Info '2016. La Havana, Cuba, October 31- November 4, 2016.es_ES
dc.description.abstractInternational collaboration in the creation of knowledge is responsible to change the structural stratification of science having profound implications for the governance of science. Analysis of collaboration in Latin American and Caribbean countries is of particular significance, because initiatives are often the result of “research-for-aid” arrangements, generally based on North–South asymmetries. However, collaboration for mutual benefit and excellence has gained increasing acceptance, with “partner” selection becoming a strategic priority to enhance one’s own production. The general aim of this study is to quantify the benefit rate in visibility and impact of scientific production in the field of nanoscience and nanotechnology (NST) bearing in mind the different types of output (total, in leadership, excellent, and excellent with leadership) of the six main producers of knowledge in NST in Latin America in the period 2003-2013. More specifically we aspire to visualize the networks of international collaboration in a given country (ego-network) to represent the difference between the citations received per type of output, and identify the associates with whom a country has greater potential and capacity to generate knowledge of high quality, as well as the differences existing in terms of visibility depending on the type of production analyzed. In short, we wish to determine the benefits of such collaborative efforts. In this way we could respond to questions such as: a) With which countries is collaboration established? and b) With which collaborating countries are the greatest volume of citations per document obtained, according to the type of output.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was made possible through financing by the Project NANOMETRICS (Ref. CSO2014-57770-R) supported by Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad of Spaines_ES
dc.subjectScientific collaborationes_ES
dc.subjectScientific excellencees_ES
dc.subjectResearch performancees_ES
dc.subjectNormalized citationes_ES
dc.subjectLatin Americaes_ES
dc.subjectNanoscience and nanotechnologyes_ES
dc.titleMeasuring research performance in international collaborationes_ES
dc.typecomunicación de congresoes_ES
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer reviewedes_ES
dc.contributor.funderMinisterio de Economía y Competitividad (España)es_ES
oprm.item.hasRevisionno ko 0 false*
Appears in Collections:(CCHS-IPP) Comunicaciones congresos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
measuring_performance_international_collaboration_ego_network_INFO2016_Cuba.pdf477,78 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Show simple item record

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons