Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/14007
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
SHARE CORE BASE | |
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE | |
Campo DC | Valor | Lengua/Idioma |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Canales, Mario | - |
dc.contributor.author | Almazán, Consuelo | - |
dc.contributor.author | Naranjo, María Victoria | - |
dc.contributor.author | Jongejan, Frans | - |
dc.contributor.author | Fuente, José de la | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2009-06-26T09:29:51Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2009-06-26T09:29:51Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2009-03-31 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | BMC Biotechnology 2009, 9:29 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1472-6750 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10261/14007 | - |
dc.description | 8 pages,2 figures and 2 tables | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | [Background] The cattle ticks, Boophilus spp., affect cattle production in tropical and subtropical regions of the world. Tick vaccines constitute a cost-effective and environmentally friendly alternative to tick control. The recombinant B. microplus Bm86 protective antigen has been shown to protect cattle against tick infestations. Recently, the gene coding for B. annulatus Bm86 ortholog, Ba86, was cloned and the recombinant protein was secreted and purified from the yeast Pichia pastoris. | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | [Results] Recombinant Ba86 (Israel strain) was used to immunize cattle to test its efficacy for the control of B. annulatus (Mercedes, Texas, USA strain) and B. microplus (Susceptible, Mexico strain) infestations. Bm86 (Gavac and Mozambique strain) and adjuvant/saline were used as positive and negative controls, respectively. Vaccination with Ba86 reduced tick infestations (71% and 40%), weight (8% and 15%), oviposition (22% and 5%) and egg fertility (25% and 50%) for B. annulatus and B. microplus, respectively. The efficacy of both Ba86 and Bm86 was higher for B. annulatus than for B. microplus. The efficacy of Ba86 was higher for B. annulatus (83.0%) than for B. microplus (71.5%). The efficacy of Bm86 (Gavac; 85.2%) but not Bm86 (Mozambique strain; 70.4%) was higher than that of Ba86 (71.5%) on B. microplus. However, the efficacy of Bm86 (both Gavac and Mozambique strain; 99.6%) was higher than that of Ba86 (83.0%) on B. annulatus. | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | [Conclusion] These experiments showed the efficacy of recombinant Ba86 for the control of B. annulatus and B. microplus infestations in cattle and suggested that physiological differences between B. microplus and B. annulatus and those encoded in the sequence of Bm86 orthologs may be responsible for the differences in susceptibility of these tick species to Bm86 vaccines. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | This work was supported by the Wellcome Trust under the Animal Health in the Developing World initiative through project 0757990 entitled "Adapting recombinant anti-tick vaccines to livestock in Africa" and the Consejería de Educación y Ciencia, JCCM, Spain (project PAI06-0046-5285) and was facilitated through the Integrated Consortium on Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases (ICTTD-3), financed by the International Cooperation Program of the European Union, coordination action project No. 510561. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 264574 bytes | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | BioMed Central | en_US |
dc.relation.isversionof | Publisher's version | - |
dc.rights | openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Boophilus annulatus | en_US |
dc.subject | B. microplus | en_US |
dc.subject | Bm86 | en_US |
dc.subject | Ba86 | en_US |
dc.subject | Recombinant | en_US |
dc.subject | Vaccination | en_US |
dc.title | Vaccination with recombinant Boophilus annulatus Bm86 ortholog protein, Ba86, protects cattle against B. annulatus and B. microplus infestations | en_US |
dc.type | artículo | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1186/1472-6750-9-29 | - |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer reviewed | en_US |
dc.relation.publisherversion | http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-9-29 | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 19335900 | - |
dc.type.coar | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | es_ES |
item.openairetype | artículo | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
item.languageiso639-1 | en | - |
item.grantfulltext | open | - |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf | - |
item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
Aparece en las colecciones: | (IREC) Artículos |
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero | Descripción | Tamaño | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1472-6750-9-29.pdf | 258,37 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizar/Abrir |
CORE Recommender
PubMed Central
Citations
32
checked on 20-mar-2024
SCOPUSTM
Citations
99
checked on 23-mar-2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
85
checked on 23-feb-2024
Page view(s)
436
checked on 28-mar-2024
Download(s)
244
checked on 28-mar-2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Altmetric
Artículos relacionados:
NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.