English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/137652
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:
Title

Characterization of a Field Spectroradiometer for Unattended Vegetation Monitoring. Key Sensor Models and Impacts on Reflectance

AuthorsPacheco-Labrador, Javier; Martín, M. Pilar
KeywordsSpectroradiometer
Automated system
Characterization
Sensor model
Dark current
Non-linearity
Temperature dependence
Spectral calibration
Cosine directional response
Hemispherical-conical reflectance factor
Issue Date11-Feb-2015
PublisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
CitationSensors 15(2): 4154–4175 (2015)
AbstractField spectroradiometers integrated in automated systems at Eddy Covariance (EC) sites are a powerful tool for monitoring and upscaling vegetation physiology and carbon and water fluxes. However, exposure to varying environmental conditions can affect the functioning of these sensors, especially if these cannot be completely insulated and stabilized. This can cause inaccuracy in the spectral measurements and hinder the comparison between data acquired at different sites. This paper describes the characterization of key sensor models in a double beam spectroradiometer necessary to calculate the Hemispherical-Conical Reflectance Factor (HCRF). Dark current, temperature dependence, non-linearity, spectral calibration and cosine receptor directional responses are modeled in the laboratory as a function of temperature, instrument settings, radiation measured or illumination angle. These models are used to correct the spectral measurements acquired continuously by the same instrument integrated outdoors in an automated system (AMSPEC-MED). Results suggest that part of the instrumental issues cancel out mutually or can be controlled by the instrument configuration, so that changes induced in HCFR reached about 0.05 at maximum. However, these corrections are necessary to ensure the inter-comparison of data with other ground or remote sensors and to discriminate instrumentally induced changes in HCRF from those related with vegetation physiology and directional effects.
Publisher version (URL)http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s150204154
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/137652
DOI10.3390/s150204154
ISSN1424-8220
Appears in Collections:(CCHS-IEGD) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
sensors-15-04154.pdf2,63 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.