English   español  
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/13450
Compartir / Impacto:
Estadísticas
Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE
Ver citas en Google académico
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar otros formatos: Exportar EndNote (RIS)Exportar EndNote (RIS)Exportar EndNote (RIS)
Título

Managing academic conflict in English and Spanish academic book reviews: an intercultural rhetoric study

Autor Moreno, Ana I.; Suárez, Lorena
Palabras clave Academic conflict
Academic Writing
Evaluation
Academic Book Reviews
Reviewing
Critical attitude
Critical comments
English for Academic Purposes
Critical approach
Cross-cultural
Intercultural
Contrastive rhetoric
Intercultural rhetoric
Discourse analysis
Fecha de publicación 3-jun-2009
ResumenReviewing an academic book can be considered as a potential face-threatening act. The aim of the present paper is to provide insight into how scholars from different but comparable writing cultures manage the potential academic conflict caused by reviewing an academic book. Based on two comparable corpora of 20 academic book reviews of literature written in international English and 20 in Castilian Spanish, the paper compares the frequency and type of critical comments made by the reviewers on the book under review as a function of the size of the academic community the author of the book and the reviewer belong to. Critical comments are defined as positive or negative appreciations of a given aspect or sub-aspect of the book under review. They are identified, interpreted and measured in a way that takes the co-text and the rhetorical context into account, irrespective of their lexico-grammatical realisation. The results show that the Castilian Spanish writers of literary academic book reviews are much less critical in general and show a much lower tendency to evaluate the book negatively than their Anglo-American counterparts. Contextual information provided by the book review writers through an e-mail questionnaire supports the hypothesis that a close personal or professional relationship between the reviewer and the author of the book (or the prospect of it), which is more likely to happen in a small academic community, affects the way scholars manage the academic conflict potentially caused by reviewing a professional peer’s work.
Descripción This paper was presented at the InterLAE Conference, organised by Universidad de Zaragoza (Spain), Departamento de Filología Inglesa y Alemana (http://www.unizar.es/interlae/conference08.html) in JACA on 11-13 December 2008
URI http://hdl.handle.net/10261/13450
Aparece en las colecciones: (CCHS-IEDCYT) Comunicaciones congresos
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
Moreno-Suarez_INTERLAE_Conference_presentation_08.pdfPresentation paper: written version97,69 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Moreno_presentation_video.wmvPresentation paper: video recording134,47 MBVLC media file (.wmv)Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo
 


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.