English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/132256
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez, Airames_ES
dc.contributor.authorChiaradia, Andrées_ES
dc.contributor.authorWasiak, Paulaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorRenwick, L.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorDann, Peteres_ES
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Biological Rhythms, 31:194-204 (2016)es_ES
dc.description.abstractVisible light on Earth largely comes from the sun, including light reflected from the moon. Predation risk is strongly determined by light conditions, and some animals are nocturnal to reduce predation. Artificial lights and its consequent light pollution may disrupt this natural behavior. Here, we used 13 years of attendance data to study the effects of sun, moon, and artificial light on the attendance pattern of a nocturnal seabird, the little penguin Eudyptula minor at Phillip Island, Australia. The little penguin is the smallest and the only penguin species whose activity on land is strictly nocturnal. Automated monitoring systems recorded individually marked penguins every time they arrived (after sunset) at or departed (before sunrise) from 2 colonies under different lighting conditions: natural night skylight and artificial lights (around 3 lux) used to enhance penguin viewing for ecotourism around sunset. Sunlight had a strong effect on attendance as penguins arrived on average around 81 min after sunset and departed around 92 min before sunrise. The effect of moonlight was also strong, varying according to moon phase. Fewer penguins came ashore during full moon nights. Moon phase effect was stronger on departure than arrival times. Thus, during nights between full moon and last quarter, arrival times (after sunset) were delayed, even though moonlight levels were low, while departure times (before sunrise) were earlier, coinciding with high moonlight levels. Cyclic patterns of moon effect were slightly out of phase but significantly between 2 colonies, which could be due to site-specific differences or presence/absence of artificial lights. Moonlight could be overridden by artificial light at our artificially lit colony, but the similar amplitude of attendance patterns between colonies suggests that artificial light did not mask the moonlight effect. Further research is indeed necessary to understand how seabirds respond to the increasing artificial night light levels.es_ES
dc.publisherSage Publicationses_ES
dc.subjectEudyptula minores_ES
dc.subjectArtificial light,es_ES
dc.subjectAttendance pattern,es_ES
dc.subjectLight pollution,es_ES
dc.titleWaddling on the Dark Side: Ambient Light Affects Attendance Behavior of Little Penguinses_ES
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer reviewedes_ES
oprm.item.hasRevisionno ko 0 false*
Appears in Collections:(EBD) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Rodriguez et al Penguins & Lights R4.FINAL.pdf764,57 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Show simple item record

Related articles:

WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.