Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/131626
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
SHARE CORE BASE | |
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE | |
Título: | Comparing quasiparticle H2O level alignment on anatase and rutile TiO2 |
Autor: | Sun, Huijuan; Mowbray, Duncan J. CSIC ORCID; Migani, Annapaola CSIC ORCID; Zhao, Jin; Petek, Hrvoje; Rubio, Angel CSIC ORCID | Palabras clave: | Photooxidation Photocatalysis G0W0 calculations Water splitting Titania Hole trapping |
Fecha de publicación: | 2015 | Editor: | American Chemical Society | Citación: | ACS Catalysis 5(7): 4242-4254 (2015) | Resumen: | Knowledge of the alignment of molecular frontier levels in the ground state can be used to predict the photocatalytic activity of an interface. The position of the adsorbate’s highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) levels relative to the substrate’s valence band maximum (VBM) in the interface describes the favorability of photogenerated hole transfer from the VBM to the adsorbed molecule. This is a key quantity for assessing and comparing H2O photooxidation activities on two prototypical photocatalytic TiO2 surfaces: anatase (A)-TiO2(101) and rutile (R)-TiO2(110). Using the projected density of states (DOS) from state-of-the-art quasiparticle (QP) G0W0 calculations, we assess the relative photocatalytic activity of intact and dissociated H2O on coordinately unsaturated (Ticus) sites of idealized stoichiometric A-TiO2(101)/R-TiO2(110) and bridging O vacancies (Obrvac) of defective A-TiO2–x(101)/R-TiO2–x(110) surfaces (x = 1/4, 1/8) for various coverages. Such a many-body treatment is necessary to correctly describe the anisotropic screening of electron–electron interactions at a photocatalytic interface and, hence, obtain accurate interfacial level alignments. The more favorable ground state HOMO level alignment for A-TiO2(101) may explain why the anatase polymorph shows higher photocatalytic activities than the rutile polymorph. Our results indicate that (1) hole trapping is more favored on A-TiO2(101) than R-TiO2(110) and (2) HO@Ticus is more photocatalytically active than intact H2O@Ticus. | Descripción: | arXiv:1506.04695v1 | Versión del editor: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.5b00529 | URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10261/131626 | DOI: | 10.1021/acscatal.5b00529 | Identificadores: | doi: 10.1021/acscatal.5b00529 e-issn: 2155-5435 |
Aparece en las colecciones: | (CFM) Artículos (CIN2) Artículos |
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero | Descripción | Tamaño | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|---|
ComparingQuasiparticle.pdf | 10,14 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizar/Abrir |
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
48
checked on 22-abr-2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
47
checked on 20-feb-2024
Page view(s)
278
checked on 24-abr-2024
Download(s)
235
checked on 24-abr-2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Altmetric
NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.