English   español  
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/131404
COMPARTIR / IMPACTO:
Estadísticas
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:

Título

Benchmarking scientific performance by decomposing leadership of Cuban and Latin American institutions in Public Health

AutorChinchilla-Rodríguez, Zaida ; Zacca-González, Grisel; Vargas-Quesada, Benjamín; Moya Anegón, Félix de
Palabras claveScientometrics
Public Health
Latin America
Cuba
Scientific Collaboration
Normalized citation
Leadership
Fecha de publicación2016
EditorSpringer
CitaciónScientometrics
ResumenComparative benchmarking with bibliometric indicators can be an aid in decision-making with regard to research management. This study aims to characterize scientific performance in a domain (Public Health) by the institutions of a country (Cuba), taking as reference world output and regional output (other Latin American centers) during the period 2003–2012. A new approach is used here to assess to what extent the leadership of a specific institution can change its citation impact. Cuba was found to have a high level of specialization and scientific leadership that does not match the low international visibility of Cuban institutions. This leading output appears mainly in non-collaborative papers, in national journals; publication in English is very scarce and the rate of international collaboration is very low. The Instituto de Medicina Tropical Pedro Kouri stands out, alone, as a national reference. Meanwhile, at the regional level, Latin American institutions deserving mention for their high autonomy in normalized citation would include Universidad de Buenos Aires (ARG), Universidade Federal de Pelotas (BRA), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientı´ficas y Te´cnicas (ARG), Instituto Oswaldo Cruz (BRA) and the Centro de Pesquisas Rene Rachou (BRA). We identify a crucial aspect that can give rise to misinterpretations of data: a high share of leadership cannot be considered positive for institutions when it is mainly associated with a high proportion of non-collaborative papers and a very low level of performance. Because leadership might be questionable in some cases, we propose future studies to ensure a better interpretation of findings.
DescripciónChinchilla-Rodríguez, Zaida, Zacca-González, Grisel, Vargas-Quesada, Benjamín, Moya-Anegón, Félix (2016). Benchmarking scientific performance by decomposing leadership of Cuban and Latin American institutions in Public Health. Scientometrics, 106(3), 1239–1264. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-015-1831-z
Versión del editorhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1831-z
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/131404
DOI10.1007/s11192-015-1831-z
ISSN0138-9130
Aparece en las colecciones: (CCHS-IPP) Artículos
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
benchmarking_scientific_performance_leadership_Cuban_LAC_preprint.pdfArtículo 655,65 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo
 

Artículos relacionados:


Este item está licenciado bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons