Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/130958
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Título

Towards a unified paradigm for sequence-based identification of fungi

AutorKõljalg, Urmas; Dueñas, Margarita CSIC ORCID; Martín, María P. CSIC ORCID ; Tellería, M. T.; Larsson, Karl-Henrik
Palabras claveBioinformatics
DNA barcoding
Ecological genomics
Fungi
Microbial diversity
Fecha de publicación2013
EditorWiley-Blackwell
CitaciónMolecular Ecology 22(21): 5271-5277 (2013)
ResumenThe nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region is the formal fungal barcode and in most cases the marker of choice for the exploration of fungal diversity in environmental samples. Two problems are particularly acute in the pursuit of satisfactory taxonomic assignment of newly generated ITS sequences: (i) the lack of an inclusive, reliable public reference data set and (ii) the lack of means to refer to fungal species, for which no Latin name is available in a standardized stable way. Here, we report on progress in these regards through further development of the UNITE database (http://unite.ut.ee) for molecular identification of fungi. All fungal species represented by at least two ITS sequences in the international nucleotide sequence databases are now given a unique, stable name of the accession number type (e.g. Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus|GU586904|SH133781.05FU), and their taxonomic and ecological annotations were corrected as far as possible through a distributed, third-party annotation effort. We introduce the term ‘species hypothesis’ (SH) for the taxa discovered in clustering on different similarity thresholds (97–99%). An automatically or manually designated sequence is chosen to represent each such SH. These reference sequences are released (http://unite.ut.ee/repository.php) for use by the scientific community in, for example, local sequence similarity searches and in the QIIME pipeline. The system and the data will be updated automatically as the number of public fungal ITS sequences grows. We invite everybody in the position to improve the annotation or metadata associated with their particular fungal lineages of expertise to do so through the new Web-based sequence management system in UNITE.
DescripciónKõljalg, Urmas et al.
Versión del editorhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mec.12481
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/130958
DOI10.1111/mec.12481
ISSN0962-1083
E-ISSN1365-294X
Reputación del trabajo revisado90
Revisiones por pares100Ver revisión de Spouge, John L
80Ver revisión de Schoch, Conrad
Aparece en las colecciones: (RJB) Artículos




Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
paradigm_sequence-based_identification_fungi_Koljalg.pdf307,08 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Fig_S1_Generation_global_key_technical_description.pdfGeneration of the global key: technical description103,77 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Fig_S2_global_key_annotations.pdfGlobal key annotations2,58 MBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Fig_ S3_format_UNITE_reference_sequences_FASTA.pdfFormat of the UNITE reference sequences FASTA file available for download at unite.ut.ee and used by QIIME59,36 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Fig_S4_screenshot_UNITE_global_key.pdfScreenshot of the UNITE global key workbench depicting the cluster UCL5_0056394,47 MBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Fig_S5_screenshot_UNITE_global_key.pdfScreenshot of the UNITE global key workbench depicting the species hypotheses SH5155686.05FU. This workbench allows to choose reference sequences2,23 MBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo

CORE Recommender

La reputación del trabajo revisado es el promedio de las calificaciones de sus revisiones. Se necesitan al menos 2 revisiones, o la reputación del trabajo estará sin definir. Además, la reputación depende de la reputación de los revisores, que se obtiene de los comentarios que pueden hacer los autores sobre las revisiones recibidas. Cada vez que un trabajo recibe una nueva revisión o cada vez que una revisión recibe un nuevo comentario de autor, la reputación del trabajo revisado se recalcula. Más en Preguntas frecuentes.

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

2.668
checked on 20-abr-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

2.524
checked on 27-feb-2024

Page view(s)

715
checked on 19-abr-2024

Download(s)

1.358
checked on 19-abr-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.