Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/130459
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Título

In vitro evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of plant extracts from Ruta graveolens and Annona muricata

AutorPortilla, Y.; Carro Travieso, Mª Dolores CSIC ORCID; Milián, G.; Camacho, C.; Valdivia, A.; Díaz Reyes, Alexey CSIC; Saro Higuera, Cristina CSIC ORCID; Mateos Álvarez, Iván CSIC ORCID ; Ranilla, María José CSIC ORCID
Palabras claveRuta graveolens
Annona muricata
Gram-positive
Fecha de publicación2015
EditorAmerican Society of Animal Science
CitaciónJournal of Animal Science 93 (Suppl. s3/J) M43 (2015)
ResumenResistance of microorganisms to commercial drugs is increasing worldwide, and therefore the search for new antimicrobial agents is a key issue. The aim of this study was to identify the potential of plant extracts from Ruta graveolens and Annona muricata as candidates for the development ofnew antimicrobials. Plant extracts were obtained by the Soxhlet method and their biological evaluation was carried out by the agar diffusion method, with 4 doses assayed (6.25, 25, 50 and 100 mg/mL) and 4 replicates per dose. Eight bacteria! strains from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) were tested: Escherichia coli 0157 (ATCC 43894), Streptoccocus agalactiae (ATCC 13813), Salmonella enteritidis (ATCC BBA664), Enterobacter aerogenes (ATCC 13048), Staphylococcus aureus (ATTC 13565), Klebsiella pneumoniae (ATCC 4352), Proteus mirabilis (ATCC 14153) and Proteus vulgaris (ATCC 9484). Extracts from both plants showed antibacterial activity against ali bacteria tested, with the exception of A. muricata extrae! against S. enteritidis. Minimum inhibitory concentration for both extracts was 6.25 mg/mL for E. aerogenes, S. agalactiae, S. aureus, and K. pneumoniae, 25 mg/mL for E. coli, P. mirabilis, and P. vulgaris, and 50 mg/mL of R. graveolens for Salmonella enteritidis. There were no differences between extracts in their antibacterial activity against P. vulgar is (P = 0.91) and K. pneumoniae (P = 0.37), but R. graveolens extract showed greater (P < O. 001) anti bacteria! activity against E. coli and S. agalactiae thanA. muricata extract, anda trend was also observed for E. aerogenes (P = 0.064). In contrast, A. muricata extract tended to have greater (P 22 = 0.094) antibacterial activity against P. mirabilis compared with R. graveolens extract. The results suggest that these extracts have active ingredients that could help to develop new antimicrobial products for the improvement of animal production and health
DescripciónTrabajo presentado al : Joint Annual Meeting. ADSA-ASAS. (Orlando, Florida, USA, Julio 12-16, 2015. M43.
Versión del editorhttp://www.jtmtg.org/jam/2015/
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/130459
E-ISSN1525-3163
Aparece en las colecciones: (IGM) Comunicaciones congresos

Mostrar el registro completo

CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

175
checked on 23-abr-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.