Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/130314
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Título

Effect of cobalt supplementation and fractionation on the biological response in the biomethanization of Olive Mill Solid Waste

AutorPinto-Ibieta, F.; Serrano Moral, Antonio CSIC ORCID; Jeison, D.; Borja Padilla, Rafael CSIC ORCID ; Fermoso, Fernando G. CSIC ORCID
Palabras claveTrace metal requirements
Methane production rate
Improved anaerobic digestion
Cobalt fractionation
Olive Mill Solid Waste
Fecha de publicaciónjul-2016
EditorElsevier
CitaciónBioresource Technology 211: 58–64 (2016)
ResumenDue to the low trace metals concentration in the Olive Mill Solid Waste (OMSW), a proposed strategy to improve its biomethanization is the supplementation of key metals to enhance the microorganism activity. Among essential trace metals, cobalt has been reported to have a crucial role in anaerobic degradation. This study evaluates the effect of cobalt supplementation to OMSW, focusing on the connection between fractionation of cobalt in the system and the biological response. The highest biological responses was found in a range from 0.018 to 0.035 mg/L of dissolved cobalt (0.24–0.65 mg total cobalt/L), reaching improvements up to 23% and 30% in the methane production rate and the methane yield coefficient, respectively. It was found that the dissolved cobalt fraction is more accurately related with the biological response than the total cobalt. The total cobalt is distorted by the contribution of dissolved and non-dissolved inert fractions.
Descripción28 Páginas; 5 Figuras; 3 Tablas
Versión del editorhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.03.031
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/130314
DOI10.1016/j.biortech.2016.03.031
ISSN0960-8524
Aparece en las colecciones: (IG) Artículos




Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
Postprint_2016_BioresourceTech_V211_P58.pdfArtículo principal838,75 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo

CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

29
checked on 08-abr-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

25
checked on 25-feb-2024

Page view(s)

314
checked on 19-abr-2024

Download(s)

286
checked on 19-abr-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Este item está licenciado bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons