Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/12264
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorLorenzo, Víctor de-
dc.date.accessioned2009-04-14T07:57:50Z-
dc.date.available2009-04-14T07:57:50Z-
dc.date.issued2009-01-29-
dc.identifier.citationClinical Microbiology and Infection, Volume 15 Issue s1, Pages 63 - 65en_US
dc.identifier.issn1198-743X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/12264-
dc.description.abstractFrom a biotechnological point of view, bacteria can be seen as either pathogens to target with new drugs or as biocatalysts for large-scale processes in industry, agriculture or the environment. The last includes the exploitation of bacterial activities for bioremediation of toxic waste either in situ or ex situ. The onset of genetic engineering in the late 70s opened the possibility of tailoring recombinant bacteria for environmental release, aimed at biodegradation of otherwise recalcitrant chemicals. However, a few decades later the outcome of this prospect has been quite meager. The literature counts very few cases where the use of genetically engineered bacteria has been proven to be more efficient than natural microorganisms in elimination of recalcitrant compounds under natural (not laboratory) conditions. Fortunately, the emergence of Systems and Synthetic Biology in the last few years is helping to identify what were the caveats of the former approaches and how to correct them. In addition, robust design concepts imported from process engineering provides fresh approaches to the challenge of designing microorganisms á la carte for environmental applications.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by grants of the 6th and 7th Framework Programmes of the European Union and the Spanish Ministery of Science and Education. The author declares no conflicts of interesten_US
dc.format.extent6080 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeimage/gif-
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherEuropean Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseasesen_US
dc.rightsclosedAccessen_US
dc.subjectBiodegradationen_US
dc.subjectPseudomonasen_US
dc.subjectRecombinant antibodiesen_US
dc.subjectSynthetic biologyen_US
dc.titleRecombinant bacteria for environmental release: what went wrong and what we have learnt from iten_US
dc.typeartículoen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1469-0691.2008.02683.x-
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer revieweden_US
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2008.02683.xen_US
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501es_ES
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypeartículo-
Aparece en las colecciones: (CNB) Artículos
Show simple item record

CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

54
checked on 20-abr-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

43
checked on 28-feb-2024

Page view(s)

349
checked on 24-abr-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.