Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/12230
Share/Export:
![]() ![]() |
|
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE | |
Title: | Maximum likelihood refinement of electron microscopy data with normalization errors |
Authors: | Scheres, Sjors H. W.; Valle, Mikel; Grob, Patricia; Nogales, Eva; Carazo, José M. | Keywords: | Single particle analysis Structural heterogeneity Classification Expectation maximization |
Issue Date: | May-2009 | Publisher: | Elsevier | Citation: | Journal of Structural Biology, 166: 2 (2009) 234-240 | Abstract: | Commonly employed data models for maximum likelihood refinement of electron microscopy images behave poorly in the presence of normalization errors. Small variations in background mean or signal brightness are relatively common in cryo-electron microscopy data, and varying signal-to-noise ratios or artifacts in the images interfere with standard normalization procedures. In this paper, a statistical data model that accounts for normalization errors is presented, and a corresponding algorithm for maximum likelihood classification of structurally heterogeneous projection data is derived. The extended data model has general relevance, since similar algorithms may be derived for other maximum likelihood approaches in the field. The potentials of this approach are illustrated for two structurally heterogeneous data sets: 70S E.coli ribosomes and human RNA polymerase II complexes. In both cases, maximum likelihood classification based on the conventional data model failed, whereas the new approach was capable of revealing previously unobserved conformations. | Publisher version (URL): | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsb.2009.02.007 | URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10261/12230 | DOI: | 10.1016/j.jsb.2009.02.007 | ISSN: | 1047-8477 |
Appears in Collections: | (CNB) Artículos |
Show full item record
Review this work
PubMed Central
Citations
14
checked on May 15, 2022
SCOPUSTM
Citations
24
checked on May 19, 2022
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
23
checked on May 19, 2022
Page view(s)
399
checked on May 24, 2022
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Dimensions
Related articles:
WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.