Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/121088
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorMestre, Lucíaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorReig Córdoba, Gemmaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorBetrán Aso, Jesús Ángeles_ES
dc.contributor.authorPinochet, Jorgees_ES
dc.contributor.authorMoreno Sánchez, María Ángeleses_ES
dc.date.accessioned2015-08-12T08:32:07Z-
dc.date.available2015-08-12T08:32:07Z-
dc.date.issued2015-08-
dc.identifier.citationInfluence of peach-almond hybrids and plum-based rootstocks on mineral nutrition and yield characteristics of 'Big Top' nectarine in replant and heavy-calcareous soil conditions. Scientia Horticulturae 192: 475-481 (2015)es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0304-4238-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/121088-
dc.description23 Pags.- 4 Tabls.- 2 Figs. The definitive version is available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/03044238es_ES
dc.description.abstractThe agronomic performance and leaf mineral nutrition for 'Big Top' nectarine budded onto twelve Prunus rootstocks were evaluated. Seven Prunus amygdalus × Prunus persica hybrids (Adafuel, Adarcias, Felinem, Garnem, Monegro, GF 677, and Mayor), two Prunus davidiana × P. persica hybrids (Barrier, Cadaman), a Prunus insititia plum (Adesoto), a Prunus domestica plum (Tetra), and another selection considered to be an hybrid of Prunus cerasifera × P. amygdalus parentage (Replantpac). Rootstocks were budded during the summer of 1999, and trees were established in a replant site in March 2001. The trial was located in the Ebro Valley (Northeastern, Spain) on a heavy-textured and calcareous soil typical of the Mediterranean area which supported a previous peach orchard until 2000. At the thirteenth year after budding, growing conditions generated varying levels of tree mortality, the highest with peach-almond hybrids: Adafuel, Garnem and Monegro. In contrast, all Replantpac trees survived well and the mortality rate was low on the other rootstocks. Adesoto, Tetra, and Adarcias proved to be the most dwarfing rootstocks, while Cadaman and Replantpac were the most invigorating and generated greater cumulative yields. However, the highest yield efficiency was recorded on GF 677, although it did not differ significantly from other peach-almond (Adarcias, Felinem) and plum (Adesoto, Tetra) rootstocks. The highest fruit weight was observed on Barrier and the lowest on Felinem and Mayor, but they did not differ significantly from the rest of rootstocks. Leaf mineral analysis of trees showed all rootstocks induced N and Fe deficiency and P optimum value according to reference values. Nevertheless, the tendency of plum Adesoto to induce higher Fe leaf concentration could indicate higher tolerance to iron-chlorosis in calcareous soils. The most invigorating rootstock Replantpac seems to induce higher SPAD values and adequate K, Mg and Mn values according to reference values. Tetra induced the best balanced nutritional values (σDOP), especially when compared with Barrier and Cadaman, although it did not differ significantly from GF 677 and Mayor.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was funded by the Spanish MICINN (Ministry of Science and Innovation) grants AGL2005-05533, AGL2008-00283 and AGL2011-24576, and RFP 2012-00020 cofunded by FEDER and the Regional Government of Aragon (A44).es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.relation.isversionofPostprintes_ES
dc.rightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.subjectChlorosises_ES
dc.subjectFoliar mineral analysises_ES
dc.subjectInterspecific hybridses_ES
dc.subjectVigoures_ES
dc.titleInfluence of peach-almond hybrids and plum-based rootstocks on mineral nutrition and yield characteristics of 'Big Top' nectarine in replant and heavy-calcareous soil conditionses_ES
dc.typeartículoes_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.scienta.2015.05.020-
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer reviewedes_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.05.020es_ES
dc.embargo.terms2017-08-31es_ES
dc.rights.licensehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-
dc.contributor.funderMinisterio de Ciencia e Innovación (España)es_ES
dc.contributor.funderGobierno de Aragónes_ES
dc.relation.csices_ES
dc.identifier.funderhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004837es_ES
dc.identifier.funderhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100010067es_ES
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501es_ES
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairetypeartículo-
Aparece en las colecciones: (EEAD) Artículos
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
MorenoM_SciHortic_2015.pdf220,88 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Show simple item record

CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

64
checked on 06-abr-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

50
checked on 24-feb-2024

Page view(s)

509
checked on 16-abr-2024

Download(s)

698
checked on 16-abr-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Este item está licenciado bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons