Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/11750
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Título

Determination of carbaryl in natural water samples by a surface plasmon resonance flow-through immunosensor

AutorMauriz, Elba CSIC ORCID; Calle Martín, Ana CSIC; Abad, Antonio; Montoya, Ángel; Hildebrandt, Alain CSIC; Barceló, Damià CSIC ORCID; Lechuga, Laura M. CSIC ORCID
Palabras claveSurface plasmon resonance (SPR)
Immunosensor
Self-assembled monolayer
Carbaryl
Validation
Environmental analysis
Fecha de publicación15-may-2006
EditorElsevier
CitaciónBiosensors & Bioelectronics 21(11): 2129-2336 (2006)
ResumenThe analysis of carbaryl in natural water samples was accomplished using a portable immunosensor based on surface plasmon resonance (SPR) technology. The assay was based on a binding inhibition immunoassay format with the analyte derivative covalently immobilized on the sensor surface. An alkanethiol self-assembled monolayer (SAM) was formed onto the gold-coated sensor surface to allow the reusability of the same sensing surface during 220 regeneration cycles. Reproducibility was evaluated by performing three independent assays in triplicate on 3 different days. The batch-assay variability was also calculated using three different gold-coated sensor surfaces. The intra- and inter-day relative standard deviation were 8.6 and 15.3%, respectively, whilst a variation of 7.4% in assay sensitivity was obtained by employing different sensor chips. The lowest detection limit, calculated as the concentration providing a 10% decrease of the blank signal, was of 1.38 μg L−1. Matrix effects were also evaluated in different water types, showing I50 values (carbaryl concentrations that produced a 50% decrease of the blank signal) within the range of carbaryl standard curves in distilled water (2.78–3.55 μg L−1). The carbaryl immunoassay performance was validated with respect to conventional high-performance liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (HPLC–MS). The correlation between methods was in good agreement (r2 = 0.998, 0.999 and 0.999) for the three types of natural water samples tested. A complete assay cycle, including regeneration, is accomplished in 20 min. All measurements were carried out with the SPR sensor system (β-SPR) commercialised by the company SENSIA, SL (Spain). The small size and low-time of response of the β-SPR platform would allow its utilization in real contaminated locations.
Descripción8 pages, 3 tables, 5 figures.-- PMID: 16309901 [PubMed].-- Available online Nov 23, 2005.
Versión del editorhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2005.10.013
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/11750
DOI10.1016/j.bios.2005.10.013
ISSN0956-5663
Aparece en las colecciones: (IMN-CNM) Artículos
(IDAEA) Artículos

Mostrar el registro completo

CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

127
checked on 18-mar-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

112
checked on 14-feb-2024

Page view(s)

378
checked on 18-mar-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.