Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/115701
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Título

The upper Miocene mammal record from the Teruel-Alfambra region (Spain). The MN system and continental stage/age concepts discussed

AutorVan Dam, J. A.; Alcalá, Luis; Alonso-Zarza, Ana María CSIC ORCID ; Calvo Sorando, J. P.; Garcés, Miguel; Krijgsman, W.
Fecha de publicación2001
EditorTaylor & Francis
CitaciónJournal of Vertebrate Paleontology 21(2): 367-385 (2001)
ResumenAn extended and revised mammal succession of 99 fossil localities from the Upper Miocene sediments of the Teruel-Alfambra region (NE Spain) is presented. An updated biozonation is proposed. The biostratigraphic justification for the correlation of the magnetic polarity patterns of the La Gloria, El Bunker, Masada Ruea, Masada del Valle and Masía de la Roma sections to the Geomagnetic Polarity Time Scale (GPTS) is discussed. A comparison with Late Miocene faunas from elsewhere in Europe demonstrates that faunal resemblance across the continent is very low. As illustrated by an analysis of the “Progonomys event,” local appearances of genera may be strongly diachronous and even species should not a priori be assumed to be isochronous at resolutions higher than several hundred thousands of years. These observations have implications for European continental stratigraphy and chronology: (1) The usefulness of the European mammal-based Stages/Ages can be doubted because their biostratigraphic significance is mainly local, and because more and more direct calibrations of mammal faunas to the numerical time scale are becoming established; (2) The European Mammal Neogene (MN) system, currently defined as a series of 16 time-ordered faunas, should not be divided into sub-units, because this weakens its power for cross-continental faunal correlation. In addition, the use of MN “boundaries” is erroneous and misleading, both from a philosophic and technical point of view.
Versión del editorhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1671/0272-4634(2001)021[0367:TUMMRF]2.0.CO;2
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/115701
DOI10.1671/0272-4634(2001)021[0367:TUMMRF]2.0.CO;2
ISSN0272-4634
E-ISSN1937-2809
Aparece en las colecciones: (MNCN) Artículos




Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
accesoRestringido.pdf15,38 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo

CORE Recommender

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

122
checked on 26-feb-2024

Page view(s)

326
checked on 23-abr-2024

Download(s)

104
checked on 23-abr-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.