Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/11532
Share/Export:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE
Title

An attempt to rank copper-based catalysts used in the CO-PROX reaction

AuthorsLópez Suárez, Irene CSIC; Valdés-Solís Iglesias, Teresa CSIC ORCID ; Marbán Calzón, Gregorio CSIC ORCID
KeywordsPreferential oxidation
CO
Hydrogen
Copper-based catalysts
Catalytic reaction rate
Issue DateJan-2008
PublisherElsevier
CitationInternational Journal of Hydrogen Energy 33(1): 197-205 (2008)
AbstractThis work provides a comparison of the activities of copper-based catalysts in the preferential oxidation of CO in the presence of H2. The Liu–Flytzani-Stephanopoulos equation [Liu W, Flytzani-Stephanopoulos M. Total oxidation of carbon monoxide and methane over transition metal-fluorite oxide composite catalysts II. Catalyst characterization and reaction kinetics. J Catal 1995;153:317–332] was used to evaluate catalytic rate constants on the basis of the data reported by various groups and in some cases these data were found to be insufficient. Although the reaction rate constants obtained could in some cases be influenced by experimental artefacts, it was unambiguously established that the addition of modifiers (e.g. Zr, Sn, Co, etc.) to the copper–ceria catalysts does not produce any improvement in the catalytic activity of these catalysts and that chelating methods are the most appropriate procedures for the preparation of CO-PROX catalysts. Deactivation during the testing of catalysts has received little attention in the literature, and yet it is a potential source of uncertainty in the catalytic activities reported.
Description9 pages, 1 figure, 5 tables. -- Available online 24 October 2007.
Publisher version (URL)http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.09.011
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/11532
DOI10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.09.011
ISSN0360-3199
Appears in Collections:(INCAR) Artículos

Show full item record
Review this work

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

63
checked on May 25, 2022

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

60
checked on May 24, 2022

Page view(s)

415
checked on May 27, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Dimensions


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.