Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/111400
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
SHARE CORE BASE | |
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE | |
Título: | Agreements and misunderstandings among three scientific fields: Paleogenomics, archaeology, and human paleontology |
Autor: | Lalueza-Fox, Carles CSIC ORCID | Fecha de publicación: | dic-2013 | Editor: | University of Chicago Press | Citación: | Current Anthropology 54(8): S214-S220 (2013) | Resumen: | The emergence of paleogenomics (the study and analysis of ancient genomes) has provided a new, powerful source of information that can be used to test previous hypotheses regarding human evolution. However, various misunderstandings concerning the interpretation of genetic data in an archaeological and paleontological context and the existence of different scientific goals tend to hinder the fluent and fruitful collaboration between these fields. Here we explore some of the subjects creating confusion, such as the problems associated with molecular clocks, the difference between sequence divergence and species divergence, and the limitations of the uniparental markers. Limited understanding of how the expression of a genome shapes the phenotype (including morphology and cognition) is the main obstacle to linking the genetic and the morphological evidence available. In the case of Neanderthals (and probably Denisovans, too), it is obvious that the conspicuous morphological differences cannot be explained by differences in a list of about 100 genes alone, thus suggesting that regulatory genomic elements must have been involved. A functional analysis of the genes involved as well as a study of the genomic architecture- a complexity level above the simple DNA message-could help us fill this gap. It is hoped that this future work will lead to the emergence of an interrelated and multidisciplinary view of the study of the past based on real collaborative efforts among disciplines. © 2013 by The Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research. All rights reserved. | Versión del editor: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/673387 | URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10261/111400 | DOI: | 10.1086/673387 | Identificadores: | doi: 10.1086/673387 issn: 0011-3204 e-issn: 1537-5382 |
Aparece en las colecciones: | (IBE) Artículos |
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero | Descripción | Tamaño | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|---|
three_scientific_fields_Lalueza.pdf | 243,48 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizar/Abrir |
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
7
checked on 22-abr-2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
8
checked on 27-feb-2024
Page view(s)
258
checked on 24-abr-2024
Download(s)
472
checked on 24-abr-2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Altmetric
NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.