English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/109137
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:
Title

Harbor networks as introduction gateways: contrasting distribution patterns of native and introduced ascidians

AuthorsLópez-Legentil, S.; Legentil, Miquel L.; Erwin, Patrick M.; Turon, Xavier
KeywordsDistribution
Diversity
Tunicates
Introduced species
Barcoding
Artificial substrates
Issue Date2014
PublisherSpringer
CitationBiological Invasions : 17:1623–1638 (2015)
AbstractHarbors and marinas are well known gateways for species introductions in marine environments but little work has been done to ascertain relationships between species diversity, harbor type, and geographic distance to uncover patterns of secondary spread. Here, we sampled ascidians from 32 harbors along ca. 300 km of theNWMediterranean coast and investigated patterns of distribution and spread related to harbor type (marina, fishing, commercial) and geographic location using multivariate techniques. In total, 28 ascidians were identified at the species level and another 9 at the genus level based on morphology and genetic barcoding. Eight species were assigned to introduced forms, 15 were given native status and 5 were classified as cryptogenic. Aplidium accarense was reported for the first time in the Mediterranean Sea and was especially abundant in 23 of the harbors. Introduced and cryptogenic species were abundant in most of the surveyed harbors, while native forms were rare and restricted to a few harbors. Significant differences in the distribution of ascidians according to harbor type and latitudinal position were observed. These differences were due to the distribution of introduced species. We obtained a significant correlation between geographic distance and ascidian composition, indicating that closely located harbors shared more ascidian species among them. This study showed that harbors act as dispersal strongholds for introduced species, with native species only appearing sporadically, and that harbor type and geographic location should also be considered when developing management plans to constrain the spread of nonindigenous species in highly urbanized coastlines.
Description16 páginas, 6 tablas, 4 figuras
Publisher version (URL)http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10530-014-0821-z
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/109137
DOI10.1007/s10530-014-0821-z
ISSN1387-3547
Appears in Collections:(CEAB) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
López-Legentil et al 2015 Biol Inv.pdf1,31 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.