English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/108894
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:


Progressive decoupling between phytoplankton growth and microzooplankton grazing during an iron-induced phytoplankton bloom in the Southern Ocean (EIFEX)

AuthorsLatasa, Mikel ; Henjes, Joachim; Scharek, Renate ; Assmy, Philipp; Röttgers, Rüdiger; Smetacek, V.
KeywordsHPLC pigments
C export
Microzooplankton grazing
Flow cytometry
Dilution experiments
Top-down control
Iron fertilization
Issue DateOct-2014
PublisherInter Research
CitationMarine Ecology Progress Series 513: 39-50 (2014)
AbstractDilution experiments were performed to quantify growth and mortality rates of phytoplankton groups (as defined by pigment markers) for 5 wk in an iron-induced phytoplankton bloom during the European Iron Fertilization Experiment (EIFEX) conducted in the Southern Ocean. Rates could be reliably measured for the 2 main groups, diatoms and prymnesiophytes. Mean phytoplankton intrinsic growth rates were around 0.23 d-1, without a significant temporal trend. Mortality rates, however, decreased with time (from ∼0.3 to ∼0.06 d-1), leading to an increase in decoupling between phytoplankton growth and microzooplankton grazing. The decrease in grazing was correlated with the decrease in concentrations of small microprotozooplankton (<60 μm). As a consequence, net growth in the dilution experiments increased from around 0 d-1 up to 0.13 d-1 in the last days of the experiment, 35 d after the initial iron fertilization. This pattern did not reflect the dynamics of net phytoplankton accumulation in the fertilized patch, which increased until Days 24 to 27 and decreased thereafter. The difference between experimental and natural phytoplankton net growth is the biomass that escapes microzooplankton grazing and does not accumulate in the surface mixed layer, i.e. the biomass that went to higher trophic levels plus that exported out of the mixed layer. It increased throughout EIFEX and suggests a shift from a predominantly recycling system towards a more exporting one. © Inter-Research 2014
Description12 pages, 5 figures, 3 tables
Publisher version (URL)http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps10937
Identifiersdoi: 10.3354/meps10937
issn: 0171-8630
e-issn: 1616-1599
Appears in Collections:(ICM) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Latasa_et_al_2014.pdf352,92 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Show full item record
Review this work

Related articles:

WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.