English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/108451
logo share SHARE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:


A proposal methodology for comparing higher education institutions

AuthorsGarcía Aracil, Adela ; Palomares Montero, Davinia
Issue Date16-Jun-2011
CitationHEIR Conference 2011
AbstractThe perspective adopted to evaluate Higher Education Institutions (HEI) depends on the aims of the assessment. The literature proposes several approaches for the HEI evaluation and there are intense debates over which are the most appropriate. In this context, ranking schemes are becoming very popular. However, rankings are mainly slanted towards research and overlook important aspects of universities such as structural differences. Furthermore, depending on the indicator applied, university rankings change, which has been used to delegitimise them. In this framework, we try to gain an insight into the evaluation of HEI applying multivariate methods, to find out whether HEI can be classified into different clusters related to, at least, their three main missions (teaching, research and knowledge transfer), and fuzzy cluster analysis to find out whether HEI can be in different clusters at the same time depending on their degree of belonging to each cluster. Our analysis focuses on the Spanish HES. This study demonstrates that the evaluation of HEI is complex than just rank universities in one-dimensional ranking, given the multiple objectives of HEI. Not all universities plan their strategies in the same way and evaluations should take account of these differences.
DescriptionTrabajo presentado al 4th Annual UK and Ireland Institutional Research conference, celebrado en Londres (UK) del 16 al 17 de junio de 2011.
Publisher version (URL)http://www.heir2011.org.uk/
Appears in Collections:(INGENIO) Comunicaciones congresos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Methodology for Comparing.pdf662,12 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Show full item record
Review this work

WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.