English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/103901
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:
Title

Assesing toxicity of citrate-gold nanoparticles at different marine trophic levels (microalgae, copepods and bivalve mollusks)

AuthorsBlasco, Julián ; Moreno-Garrido, Ignacio ; Hampel, Miriam ; Otero, Jorge; Quiroga, Gonzalo ; Volland, Moritz; García-Negrete, C. A. ; Lapresta-Fernández, A. ; Fernández-Camacho, A.
Issue DateFeb-2012
CitationNanoSpain Conference (2012)
AbstractEngineered nanoparticles (ENPs) may offer benefits to society in general, although they sometimes inherently have unintended effects on ecosystems. As a consequence, assessment of the environmental safety of ENPs has become a major issue worldwide [1]. Within the metallic ENPs, gold nanoparticles have been used extensively in drug delivery, gene therapy, biosensing and contrast agent for imaging [2]. However, studies about the effects of gold nanoparticles are limited and they are specially focused on ¿in vitro¿ experiments rather than ¿in vivo¿ systems. Additionally, estuaries and coastal ecosystems are the final receptors of substances dumped in the environment wherefore the effects of these substances should be tested in representative site specific organisms. In order to assess the effect of gold-citrate nanoparticles on aquatic ecosystems, toxicity tests were carried out in three groups of model organisms belonging to different trophic levels: the marine microalgae species Cylindrotheca closterium, Chlorella autotrophyca, Phaeodactylum tricornutum, Pleurochrysis pseudoroscoffensis and Rhodomonas salina (Fig. 1), the copepod, Tisbe battagliai (Fig. 2) and the clam Ruditapes philippinarum (Fig. 3). The gold-citrate NPs employed were citrate reduced AuNPs in the range of 20 ¿ 30 nm, or soluble gold, H(AuCl4) as positive control. For the toxicity test with microalgae, the selected endpoint was population growth after 72 hours of exposure. The cells were incubated in batch cultures of 50 mL in artificial seawater enriched with simple medium (nitrate, phosphate, silica) and exposed under continuous light conditions at 20±1ºC to different dissolved Au or NPs concentrations. Growths of experimental populations were compared with controls, and concentrations which imply an inhibition of 50% respect the controls (EC50%) are calculated (Fig. 4). Dissolved Au toxicity ranged from 0.052 ± 0.001 mg¿L-1 for Rhodomonas salina to 0.50 ± 0.15 mg¿L-1 for Chlorella autotrophyca. Concentrations at ecologically significant values for NPs (up to 0.3 mg¿L-1) did not imply growth inhibitions over 50%. For copepods, nauplii (< 24 h-old) were exposed (48 h) to increasing concentrations of Au-NPs in 12-well plates (5 ml/well, 4 nauplii/well and 5 replicates/concentration) under the above described laboratory conditions [3]. The results are shown in Figure 5. The clam, Ruditapes philippinarum was exposed for 28 days to two Au-NPs concentrations: 6 and 30 ¿g·L-1. Clams were collected different at sampling points and target tissues (gills, digestive gland and mantel) were dissected and stored at -80ºC until their analysis. No significant mortality was recorded during the experiment and bioaccumulation in the digestive gland along the experiment was measured (Figure 6). In summary, no acute toxicity was recorded at ecological relevant concentrations for assayed Au-NPs. Nevertheless, further research should be necessary to know the effect of chronic exposure to these NPs and to improve the knowledge about their environmental risk assessment.
DescriptionPonencia presentada en la NanoSpain Conference, celebrada en Santander del 27 de febrero al 1 de marzo de 2012.
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/103901
Appears in Collections:(ICMAN) Comunicaciones congresos
(ICMS) Comunicaciones congresos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
assesing_toxicity_Blasco.pdf820,56 kBUnknownView/Open
Show full item record
Review this work
 


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.