English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/10019
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:

Title

Anthropoid Rights and Paternalism

AuthorsPeña, Lorenzo
KeywordsAnimalismo
Razonamiento practico
Animales no-humanos
Diferencia de grado
Libertad
Paternalismo
Humanos
Conflictos
Dilemas
Monos
Simios
Antropoides
Derechos
Animalism
Practical Reasoning
Non-human animals
Difference of Degree
Freedom
Paternalism
Humans
Liberty
Conflicts
Dilemmas
Apes
Anthropoids
Rights
Issue Date1996
CitationEtica & Animali, vol 8 (1996), pp 155-177.
AbstractAnti-animalists allege that, since humans alone are capable of engaging in some sort of higher-order practical reasoning and of being led in their behaviour by moral values, non-human animals may not be treated as persons. I argue that such a view is wrong. The difference is just one of degree. Freedom is just one value among others, not the supreme one; the differences of treatment humans and other anthropoids are entitled to do not hinge upon the question of paternalism, since humans, too, have to be treated paternalistically sometimes, at least in certain respects. Admittedly, every paternalistic action impinges on the concerned agent's freedom, thus clashing with the value of liberty. Hence, either it is unjustified or else a conflict of values arises. But there are many such conflicts, or dilemmas. One of the good things of being good or fair to our cousins the apes is that we gain a deeper insight into ourselves. We are apes after all. What is the end of their lives is also the end or goal of ours: to live, and to live well; to secure such a life both for ourselves and others. I am not erasing or obliterating differences of degree. Nor am I denying that they may be important when confronted with moral dilemmas. How much important are they? After recent research we now know that in most relevant respects the discrepancy between humans and other apes is small. They are much more human-like than we were used to think. And we are much more ape-like than we had fancied to imagine.
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/10019
Appears in Collections:(CCHS-IFS) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
anthropo.pdf76,36 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work
 


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.